Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) vs Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW)

CELH leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics, though LW is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Celsius Holdings, Inc. and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 19, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Compare
Celsius Holdings, Inc. logo
CELH
Celsius Holdings, Inc.
$7.87B
$30.80Consumer Defensive
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. logo
LW
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
$6.22B
$45.06Consumer Defensive

Total return — CELH vs LW

growth of $100 · last 10y
CELH +4451.7%LW +32.5%CELH compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
101001k10k100kStart $10020182020202220242026$4,552$133
CELH LW

CELH vs LW: by the numbers

  • •CELH is the larger company ($7.87B vs $6.22B market cap).
  • •LW trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.06 vs 77.00 P/E).
  • •CELH converts more revenue to profit (5.85% vs 4.61% net margin).
  • •CELH grew revenue faster over the past five years (81.07% vs 12.30% CAGR).
  • •LW pays a dividend (3.33% yield) while CELH does not currently pay one.

Which is better, CELH or LW?

Metric tally: CELH 8 · LW 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueLW(lower P/E)
GrowthCELH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityCELH(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCELHLW
P/E ratio77.0021.06●
Forward P/E—15.44
P/S ratio2.700.96●
P/B ratio6.403.44●
PEG ratio1.74—
EV / EBITDA33.1410.28●
FCF yield3.66%10.10%●

Profitability

MetricCELHLW
Gross margin49.62%●20.57%
Operating margin10.40%●9.33%
Net margin5.85%●4.61%
ROE13.89%16.44%●
ROIC10.01%●7.43%

Dividends

MetricCELHLW
Dividend yield—3.33%
Payout ratio—59.76%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCELHLW
Revenue CAGR (5Y)81.07%●12.30%
EPS CAGR (5Y)44.28%●-3.93%
FCF CAGR (5Y)142.28%●7.92%
Total return CAGR (5Y)7.16%●-8.68%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CELH or LW?
It depends on your goal. value: LW (lower P/E); growth: CELH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CELH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CELH leads 8 to 6.
Is CELH or LW cheaper?
On trailing earnings, LW is cheaper: CELH trades at a 77.00 P/E and LW at 21.06.
Which has grown faster, CELH or LW?
Over the past five years, CELH grew revenue faster — CELH at a 81.07% CAGR versus LW at 12.30%.
Does CELH or LW pay a bigger dividend?
LW pays a dividend (3.33% yield) while CELH does not currently pay one.
Is CELH or LW more profitable?
CELH runs the higher net margin — CELH at 5.85% versus LW at 4.61%.
Which has been the better investment, CELH or LW?
Over the past 5-year, CELH delivered the higher annualized total return — CELH at 43.24% versus LW at -8.68%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CELH analysisFull LW analysisInteractive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celsius P/E ratioLamb Weston P/E ratioCelsius dividend yieldLamb Weston dividend yieldCelsius ROELamb Weston ROECelsius operating marginLamb Weston operating marginCelsius revenue growthLamb Weston revenue growthCelsius free cash flowLamb Weston free cash flow

Celsius & Lamb Weston appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield StocksFastest Revenue Growth StocksHighest FCF Yield StocksBest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 19, 2026.