Which has the lower trailing P/E, CELH or LW?

LW has the lower trailing P/E: CELH trades at 73.02 and LW at 25.26. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CELH or LW?

Over the past five years, CELH grew revenue faster — CELH at a 81.07% CAGR versus LW at 12.49%.

Does CELH or LW pay a bigger dividend?

LW pays a dividend (2.85% yield), while CELH has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is CELH or LW more profitable?

CELH runs the higher net margin — CELH at 5.85% versus LW at 4.39%.

How have CELH and LW total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, CELH delivered 45.20% and LW delivered -2.86% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) vs Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW)

A side-by-side comparison of Celsius Holdings, Inc. and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 3, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CELH

Celsius Holdings, Inc.

$7.41B

$28.98Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Aug 3, 2026, 11:10 AM EDT

Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.

$7.25B

$52.74Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Aug 3, 2026, 11:10 AM EDT

Total return — CELH vs LW

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CELH +4174.7%LW +80.3%CELH compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CELH LW

CELH vs LW: by the numbers

•CELH is the larger company ($7.41B vs $7.25B market cap).
•LW trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (25.26 vs 73.02 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CELH converts more revenue to profit (5.85% vs 4.39% net margin).
•CELH grew revenue faster over the past five years (81.07% vs 12.49% CAGR).
•LW pays a dividend (2.85% yield), while CELH has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CELH	LW
P/E ratio	73.02	25.26
Forward P/E	18.28	18.94
P/S ratio	2.56	1.10
P/B ratio	6.07	3.97
PEG ratio	1.65	2.31
EV / EBITDA	27.48	11.38
FCF yield	3.86%	8.70%

Profitability

Metric	CELH	LW
Gross margin	49.62%	20.56%
Operating margin	18.63%	8.94%
Net margin	5.85%	4.39%
ROE	13.89%	15.89%
ROIC	10.01%	6.44%

Dividends

Metric	CELH	LW
Dividend yield	N/A	2.85%
Payout ratio	N/A	71.77%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CELH	LW
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	81.07%	12.49%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	44.28%	10.92%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	142.28%	8.01%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	5.00%	-2.86%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CELH or LW?: LW has the lower trailing P/E: CELH trades at 73.02 and LW at 25.26. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CELH or LW?: Over the past five years, CELH grew revenue faster — CELH at a 81.07% CAGR versus LW at 12.49%.
Does CELH or LW pay a bigger dividend?: LW pays a dividend (2.85% yield), while CELH has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CELH or LW more profitable?: CELH runs the higher net margin — CELH at 5.85% versus LW at 4.39%.
How have CELH and LW total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, CELH delivered 45.20% and LW delivered -2.86% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CELH analysis Full LW analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celsius P/E ratio Lamb Weston P/E ratio Celsius dividend yield Lamb Weston dividend yield Celsius ROE Lamb Weston ROE Celsius operating margin Lamb Weston operating margin Celsius revenue growth Lamb Weston revenue growth Celsius free cash flow Lamb Weston free cash flow

Celsius & Lamb Weston appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 3, 2026.