Which has the lower trailing P/E, CELH or LRN?

LRN has the lower trailing P/E: CELH trades at 129.62 and LRN at 11.48. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CELH or LRN?

Over the past five years, CELH grew revenue faster — CELH at a 74.65% CAGR versus LRN at 10.38%.

Is CELH or LRN more profitable?

LRN runs the higher net margin — CELH at 3.62% versus LRN at 13.43%.

How have CELH and LRN total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CELH delivered 43.88% and LRN delivered 20.37% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) vs Stride, Inc. (LRN)

A side-by-side comparison of Celsius Holdings, Inc. and Stride, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CELH

Celsius Holdings, Inc.

$6.96B

$27.22Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

LRN

Stride, Inc.

$3.49B

$82.00Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CELH vs LRN

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CELH +3759.4% (+44.1%/yr)LRN +538.8% (+20.4%/yr)CELH compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CELH LRN

CELH vs LRN: by the numbers

•CELH is the larger company ($6.96B vs $3.49B market cap).
•LRN trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.48 vs 129.62 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•LRN converts more revenue to profit (13.43% vs 3.62% net margin).
•CELH grew revenue faster over the past five years (74.65% vs 10.38% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CELH	LRN
P/E ratio	129.62	11.48
Forward P/E	N/A	11.05
P/S ratio	2.28	1.38
P/B ratio	2.35	2.14
EV / EBITDA	25.16	5.68
FCF yield	6.65%	10.18%

Profitability

Metric	CELH	LRN
Gross margin	48.76%	37.75%
Operating margin	18.63%	17.90%
Net margin	3.62%	13.43%
ROE	3.73%	20.72%
ROIC	5.33%	16.10%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CELH	LRN
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	74.65%	10.38%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	44.28%	34.80%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	152.98%	34.09%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-2.66%	19.48%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CELH or LRN?: LRN has the lower trailing P/E: CELH trades at 129.62 and LRN at 11.48. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CELH or LRN?: Over the past five years, CELH grew revenue faster — CELH at a 74.65% CAGR versus LRN at 10.38%.
Is CELH or LRN more profitable?: LRN runs the higher net margin — CELH at 3.62% versus LRN at 13.43%.
How have CELH and LRN total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CELH delivered 43.88% and LRN delivered 20.37% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CELH analysis Full LRN analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celsius P/E ratio Stride P/E ratio Celsius ROE Stride ROE Celsius operating margin Stride operating margin Celsius revenue growth Stride revenue growth Celsius free cash flow Stride free cash flow

Celsius & Stride appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.