Which has the lower trailing P/E, CELH or CLX?

CLX has the lower trailing P/E: CELH trades at 129.62 and CLX at 18.25. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CELH or CLX?

Over the past five years, CELH grew revenue faster — CELH at a 74.65% CAGR versus CLX at -1.75%.

Does CELH or CLX pay a bigger dividend?

CLX pays a dividend (5.60% yield), while CELH has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is CELH or CLX more profitable?

CLX runs the higher net margin — CELH at 3.62% versus CLX at 8.74%.

How have CELH and CLX total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CELH delivered 43.88% and CLX delivered -0.24% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) vs The Clorox Company (CLX)

A side-by-side comparison of Celsius Holdings, Inc. and The Clorox Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CELH

Celsius Holdings, Inc.

$6.96B

$27.22Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

CLX

The Clorox Company

$10.61B

$87.76Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CELH vs CLX

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CELH +3759.4% (+44.1%/yr)CLX -5.5% (-0.6%/yr)CELH compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CELH CLX

CELH vs CLX: by the numbers

•CLX is the larger company ($10.61B vs $6.96B market cap).
•CLX trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (18.25 vs 129.62 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CLX converts more revenue to profit (8.74% vs 3.62% net margin).
•CELH grew revenue faster over the past five years (74.65% vs -1.75% CAGR).
•CLX pays a dividend (5.60% yield), while CELH has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CELH	CLX
P/E ratio	129.62	18.25
Forward P/E	N/A	15.12
P/S ratio	2.28	1.58
P/B ratio	2.35	117.91
EV / EBITDA	25.16	8.38
FCF yield	6.65%	3.82%

Profitability

Metric	CELH	CLX
Gross margin	48.76%	42.32%
Operating margin	18.63%	24.73%
Net margin	3.62%	8.74%
ROE	3.73%	652.22%
ROIC	5.33%	20.67%

Dividends

Metric	CELH	CLX
Dividend yield	N/A	5.60%
Payout ratio	N/A	103.33%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CELH	CLX
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	74.65%	-1.75%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	44.28%	-3.13%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	152.98%	-15.59%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-2.66%	-9.01%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CELH or CLX?: CLX has the lower trailing P/E: CELH trades at 129.62 and CLX at 18.25. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CELH or CLX?: Over the past five years, CELH grew revenue faster — CELH at a 74.65% CAGR versus CLX at -1.75%.
Does CELH or CLX pay a bigger dividend?: CLX pays a dividend (5.60% yield), while CELH has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CELH or CLX more profitable?: CLX runs the higher net margin — CELH at 3.62% versus CLX at 8.74%.
How have CELH and CLX total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CELH delivered 43.88% and CLX delivered -0.24% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CELH analysis Full CLX analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celsius P/E ratio Clorox P/E ratio Clorox dividend yield Celsius ROE Clorox ROE Celsius operating margin Clorox operating margin Celsius revenue growth Clorox revenue growth Celsius free cash flow Clorox free cash flow

Celsius & Clorox appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks 25+ Year Dividend Growers Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.