Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) vs Teradyne, Inc. (TER)
A side-by-side comparison of Cadence Design Systems, Inc. and Teradyne, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CDNS
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
$284.60TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 9, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
TER
Teradyne, Inc.
$383.69TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 9, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CDNS vs TER
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCDNS +1025.3% (+27.4%/yr)TER +1827.1% (+34.4%/yr)TER compounded faster over this window
CDNS TER
CDNS vs TER: by the numbers
- •CDNS is the larger company ($78.38B vs $59.99B market cap).
- •TER trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (52.63 vs 56.58 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •TER converts more revenue to profit (25.77% vs 23.61% net margin).
- •CDNS grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.04% vs 6.58% CAGR).
- •TER pays a dividend (0.13% yield), while CDNS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CDNS | TER |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 56.58 | 52.63 |
| P/S ratio | 13.43 | 13.44 |
| P/B ratio | 11.43 | 17.45 |
| EV / EBITDA | 37.36 | 40.70 |
| FCF yield | 2.14% | 1.33% |
Profitability
| Metric | CDNS | TER |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 88.50% | 59.31% |
| Operating margin | 30.83% | 21.74% |
| Net margin | 23.61% | 25.77% |
| ROE | 20.09% | 33.46% |
| ROIC | 13.29% | 30.79% |
Dividends
| Metric | CDNS | TER |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.13% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 6.86% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CDNS | TER |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.04% | 6.58% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 13.62% | -5.86% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 15.03% | -8.02% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 11.40% | 26.83% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CDNS or TER?
- TER has the lower trailing P/E: CDNS trades at 56.58 and TER at 52.63. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CDNS or TER?
- Over the past five years, CDNS grew revenue faster — CDNS at a 15.04% CAGR versus TER at 6.58%.
- Does CDNS or TER pay a bigger dividend?
- TER pays a dividend (0.13% yield), while CDNS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CDNS or TER more profitable?
- TER runs the higher net margin — CDNS at 23.61% versus TER at 25.77%.
- How have CDNS and TER total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CDNS delivered 27.52% and TER delivered 34.90% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Cadence Design Systems P/E ratioTeradyne P/E ratioTeradyne dividend yieldCadence Design Systems ROETeradyne ROECadence Design Systems operating marginTeradyne operating marginCadence Design Systems revenue growthTeradyne revenue growthCadence Design Systems free cash flowTeradyne free cash flow
Cadence Design Systems & Teradyne appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.