Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ)

Over the past 10 years, CDNS outperformed QQQ — 30.48% vs 20.13% annualized total return (price plus dividends).

A side-by-side comparison of Cadence Design Systems, Inc. and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare
Different business models: CDNS is classified in Technology; QQQ is classified in Financial Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

Total returnCDNS vs QQQ

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 27y
CDNS +1376.5%QQQ +1442.0%QQQ compounded faster
05001k2kStart $10020042009201420192024$1,476$1,542
CDNS QQQ

Metrics side by side

Did CDNS beat QQQ?

Over the past 10 years, CDNS outperformed QQQ — 30.48% vs 20.13% annualized total return (price plus dividends).

Total return (annualized)

MetricCDNSQQQ
Total return (1Y)2.85%18.63%
Total return CAGR (3Y)13.58%21.17%
Total return CAGR (5Y)18.88%13.57%
Total return CAGR (10Y)30.48%20.13%

QQQ is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).

Frequently asked

Has CDNS beaten QQQ?
Over the past 10 years, CDNS outperformed QQQ — 30.48% vs 20.13% annualized total return (price plus dividends).

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.