Which has the lower trailing P/E, CDNS or HPE?

HPE has the lower trailing P/E: CDNS trades at 64.84 and HPE at 32.78. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CDNS or HPE?

Over the past five years, CDNS grew revenue faster — CDNS at a 15.04% CAGR versus HPE at 8.54%.

Does CDNS or HPE pay a bigger dividend?

HPE pays a dividend (0.90% yield), while CDNS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is CDNS or HPE more profitable?

CDNS runs the higher net margin — CDNS at 23.61% versus HPE at 6.57%.

How have CDNS and HPE total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CDNS delivered 27.71% and HPE delivered 21.01% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) vs Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (HPE)

A side-by-side comparison of Cadence Design Systems, Inc. and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CDNS

Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

$89.81B

$326.13TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

HPE

Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company

$83.35B

$62.94TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CDNS vs HPE

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CDNS +1025.5% (+27.4%/yr)HPE +560.0% (+20.8%/yr)CDNS compounded faster over this window

CDNS HPE

CDNS vs HPE: by the numbers

•CDNS is the larger company ($89.81B vs $83.35B market cap).
•HPE trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (32.78 vs 64.84 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CDNS converts more revenue to profit (23.61% vs 6.57% net margin).
•CDNS grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.04% vs 8.54% CAGR).
•HPE pays a dividend (0.90% yield), while CDNS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CDNS	HPE
P/E ratio	64.84	32.78
Forward P/E	40.07	16.57
P/S ratio	15.39	1.99
P/B ratio	13.10	3.14
EV / EBITDA	42.74	15.23
FCF yield	1.87%	4.99%

Profitability

Metric	CDNS	HPE
Gross margin	88.50%	36.02%
Operating margin	30.83%	8.27%
Net margin	23.61%	6.57%
ROE	20.09%	10.38%
ROIC	13.29%	6.18%

Dividends

Metric	CDNS	HPE
Dividend yield	N/A	0.90%
Payout ratio	N/A	29.04%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CDNS	HPE
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	15.04%	8.54%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	13.62%	20.10%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	15.03%	25.67%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	11.63%	37.67%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CDNS or HPE?: HPE has the lower trailing P/E: CDNS trades at 64.84 and HPE at 32.78. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CDNS or HPE?: Over the past five years, CDNS grew revenue faster — CDNS at a 15.04% CAGR versus HPE at 8.54%.
Does CDNS or HPE pay a bigger dividend?: HPE pays a dividend (0.90% yield), while CDNS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CDNS or HPE more profitable?: CDNS runs the higher net margin — CDNS at 23.61% versus HPE at 6.57%.
How have CDNS and HPE total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CDNS delivered 27.71% and HPE delivered 21.01% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CDNS analysis Full HPE analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cadence Design Systems P/E ratio Hewlett Packard Enterprise P/E ratio Hewlett Packard Enterprise dividend yield Cadence Design Systems ROE Hewlett Packard Enterprise ROE Cadence Design Systems operating margin Hewlett Packard Enterprise operating margin Cadence Design Systems revenue growth Hewlett Packard Enterprise revenue growth Cadence Design Systems free cash flow Hewlett Packard Enterprise free cash flow

Cadence Design Systems & Hewlett Packard Enterprise appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.