Which has the lower trailing P/E, CDNS or GLW?

GLW has the lower trailing P/E: CDNS trades at 68.53 and GLW at 57.28. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CDNS or GLW?

Over the past five years, CDNS grew revenue faster — CDNS at a 15.04% CAGR versus GLW at 5.24%.

Does CDNS or GLW pay a bigger dividend?

GLW pays a dividend (0.89% yield), while CDNS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is CDNS or GLW more profitable?

CDNS runs the higher net margin — CDNS at 23.61% versus GLW at 11.20%.

How have CDNS and GLW total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CDNS delivered 30.53% and GLW delivered 22.00% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) vs Corning Inc (GLW)

A side-by-side comparison of Cadence Design Systems, Inc. and Corning Inc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 29, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CDNS

Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

$91.78B

$332.76TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

GLW

Corning Inc

$106.77B

$124.06TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CDNS vs GLW

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30y

CDNS +2298.1%GLW +1625.2%CDNS compounded faster

CDNS GLW

CDNS vs GLW: by the numbers

•GLW is the larger company ($106.77B vs $91.78B market cap).
•GLW trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (57.28 vs 68.53 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CDNS converts more revenue to profit (23.61% vs 11.20% net margin).
•CDNS grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.04% vs 5.24% CAGR).
•GLW pays a dividend (0.89% yield), while CDNS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CDNS	GLW
P/E ratio	68.53	57.28
Forward P/E	42.40	38.67
P/S ratio	16.24	6.49
P/B ratio	13.82	8.76
PEG ratio	14.86	0.22
EV / EBITDA	47.70	34.88
FCF yield	1.77%	2.18%

Profitability

Metric	CDNS	GLW
Gross margin	88.50%	36.32%
Operating margin	30.83%	15.47%
Net margin	23.61%	11.20%
ROE	20.09%	15.13%
ROIC	14.11%	7.54%

Dividends

Metric	CDNS	GLW
Dividend yield	N/A	0.89%
Payout ratio	N/A	60.22%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CDNS	GLW
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	15.04%	5.24%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	13.62%	28.07%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	15.03%	6.86%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	18.98%	28.55%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CDNS or GLW?: GLW has the lower trailing P/E: CDNS trades at 68.53 and GLW at 57.28. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CDNS or GLW?: Over the past five years, CDNS grew revenue faster — CDNS at a 15.04% CAGR versus GLW at 5.24%.
Does CDNS or GLW pay a bigger dividend?: GLW pays a dividend (0.89% yield), while CDNS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CDNS or GLW more profitable?: CDNS runs the higher net margin — CDNS at 23.61% versus GLW at 11.20%.
How have CDNS and GLW total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CDNS delivered 30.53% and GLW delivered 22.00% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CDNS analysis Full GLW analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cadence Design Systems P/E ratio Corning P/E ratio Cadence Design Systems dividend yield Corning dividend yield Cadence Design Systems ROE Corning ROE Cadence Design Systems operating margin Corning operating margin Cadence Design Systems revenue growth Corning revenue growth Cadence Design Systems free cash flow Corning free cash flow

Cadence Design Systems & Corning appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 29, 2026.