Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (CDNL) vs TAT Technologies Ltd. (TATT)

A side-by-side comparison of Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. and TAT Technologies Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — CDNL vs TATT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 1y
CDNL +22.2% (+22.2%/yr)TATT -17.7% (-17.7%/yr)CDNL compounded faster over this window
100200300400Start $1002026$122$82
CDNL TATT

CDNL vs TATT: by the numbers

  • •CDNL is the larger company ($441M vs $436M market cap).
  • •CDNL trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (17.28 vs 20.98 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • •TATT converts more revenue to profit (11.26% vs 2.74% net margin).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCDNLTATT
P/E ratio17.2820.98
Forward P/E14.2220.10
P/S ratio0.672.33
P/B ratio1.802.31
EV / EBITDA3.6516.80
FCF yield0.09%1.62%

Profitability

MetricCDNLTATT
Gross margin17.46%24.98%
Operating margin7.78%9.85%
Net margin2.74%11.26%
ROE7.40%11.14%
ROIC5.66%7.53%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCDNLTATT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)N/A20.59%
Total return CAGR (5Y)N/A39.35%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CDNL or TATT?
CDNL has the lower trailing P/E: CDNL trades at 17.28 and TATT at 20.98. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Is CDNL or TATT more profitable?
TATT runs the higher net margin — CDNL at 2.74% versus TATT at 11.26%.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.