Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. (CDNL) vs L.B. Foster Company (FSTR)

A side-by-side comparison of Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc. and L.B. Foster Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — CDNL vs FSTR

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 1y
CDNL +22.2% (+22.2%/yr)FSTR +35.3% (+35.3%/yr)FSTR compounded faster over this window
100200300400Start $1002026$122$135
CDNL FSTR

CDNL vs FSTR: by the numbers

  • •CDNL is the larger company ($439M vs $386M market cap).
  • •CDNL trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (17.19 vs 35.19 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • •CDNL converts more revenue to profit (2.74% vs 2.04% net margin).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCDNLFSTR
P/E ratio17.1935.19
Forward P/E14.1422.81
P/S ratio0.660.69
P/B ratio1.792.17
EV / EBITDA3.6312.56
FCF yield0.09%10.77%

Profitability

MetricCDNLFSTR
Gross margin17.46%21.36%
Operating margin7.78%4.36%
Net margin2.74%2.04%
ROE7.40%6.39%
ROIC5.66%5.30%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCDNLFSTR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)N/A2.05%
EPS CAGR (5Y)N/A0.28%
FCF CAGR (5Y)N/A29.02%
Total return CAGR (5Y)N/A18.72%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CDNL or FSTR?
CDNL has the lower trailing P/E: CDNL trades at 17.19 and FSTR at 35.19. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Is CDNL or FSTR more profitable?
CDNL runs the higher net margin — CDNL at 2.74% versus FSTR at 2.04%.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.