Which has the lower trailing P/E, CCJ or PBA?

PBA has the lower trailing P/E: CCJ trades at 163.03 and PBA at 23.95. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CCJ or PBA?

Over the past five years, CCJ grew revenue faster — CCJ at a 15.08% CAGR versus PBA at 0.33%.

Does CCJ or PBA pay a bigger dividend?

CCJ yields 0.18% and PBA yields 4.27% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CCJ or PBA more profitable?

PBA runs the higher net margin — CCJ at 10.29% versus PBA at 22.54%.

How have CCJ and PBA total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CCJ delivered 27.34% and PBA delivered 10.56% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Cameco Corporation (CCJ) vs Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PBA)

A side-by-side comparison of Cameco Corporation and Pembina Pipeline Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 3, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CCJ

Cameco Corporation

$43.82B

$100.62EnergyDelayed quote: Sep 3, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

PBA

Pembina Pipeline Corporation

$28.26B

$48.60EnergyDelayed quote: Sep 3, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CCJ vs PBA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CCJ +1016.3% (+27.3%/yr)PBA +176.0% (+10.7%/yr)CCJ compounded faster over this window

CCJ PBA

CCJ vs PBA: by the numbers

•CCJ is the larger company ($43.82B vs $28.26B market cap).
•PBA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (23.95 vs 163.03 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PBA converts more revenue to profit (22.54% vs 10.29% net margin).
•CCJ grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.08% vs 0.33% CAGR).
•PBA pays the higher dividend yield (4.27% vs 0.18%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CCJ	PBA
P/E ratio	163.03	23.95
Forward P/E	62.59	15.37
P/S ratio	16.82	4.98
P/B ratio	8.36	2.35
EV / EBITDA	71.86	14.34
FCF yield	0.93%	5.25%

Profitability

Metric	CCJ	PBA
Gross margin	27.91%	39.62%
Operating margin	14.57%	34.04%
Net margin	10.29%	22.54%
ROE	5.11%	10.66%
ROIC	4.10%	6.05%

Dividends

Metric	CCJ	PBA
Dividend yield	0.18%	4.27%
Payout ratio	17.49%	107.09%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CCJ	PBA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	15.08%	0.33%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	37.38%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	16.00%	2.92%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	36.33%	15.26%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CCJ or PBA?: PBA has the lower trailing P/E: CCJ trades at 163.03 and PBA at 23.95. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CCJ or PBA?: Over the past five years, CCJ grew revenue faster — CCJ at a 15.08% CAGR versus PBA at 0.33%.
Does CCJ or PBA pay a bigger dividend?: CCJ yields 0.18% and PBA yields 4.27% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CCJ or PBA more profitable?: PBA runs the higher net margin — CCJ at 10.29% versus PBA at 22.54%.
How have CCJ and PBA total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CCJ delivered 27.34% and PBA delivered 10.56% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CCJ analysis Full PBA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cameco P/E ratio Pembina Pipeline P/E ratio Cameco dividend yield Pembina Pipeline dividend yield Cameco ROE Pembina Pipeline ROE Cameco operating margin Pembina Pipeline operating margin Cameco revenue growth Pembina Pipeline revenue growth Cameco free cash flow Pembina Pipeline free cash flow

Cameco & Pembina Pipeline appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 3, 2026.