Is CCJ or HAL cheaper?

On trailing earnings, HAL is cheaper: CCJ trades at a 99.55 P/E and HAL at 19.28.

Which has grown faster, CCJ or HAL?

Over the past five years, CCJ grew revenue faster — CCJ at a 13.99% CAGR versus HAL at 11.51%.

Does CCJ or HAL pay a bigger dividend?

CCJ yields 0.16% and HAL yields 1.94% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CCJ or HAL more profitable?

CCJ runs the higher net margin — CCJ at 18.49% versus HAL at 6.95%.

Which has been the better investment, CCJ or HAL?

Over the past 10-year, CCJ delivered the higher annualized total return — CCJ at 26.37% versus HAL at -0.73%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Cameco Corporation (CCJ) vs Halliburton Company (HAL)

HAL leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Cameco Corporation and Halliburton Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — CCJ vs HAL

growth of $100 · last 30y

CCJ +1312.3%HAL +165.0%CCJ compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CCJ HAL

CCJ vs HAL: by the numbers

•CCJ is the larger company ($47.43B vs $29.33B market cap).
•HAL trades at the lower earnings multiple (19.28 vs 99.55 P/E).
•CCJ converts more revenue to profit (18.49% vs 6.95% net margin).
•CCJ grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.99% vs 11.51% CAGR).
•HAL pays the higher dividend yield (1.94% vs 0.16%).

Which is better, CCJ or HAL?

Metric tally: CCJ 7 · HAL 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueHAL(lower P/E)

GrowthCCJ(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeHAL(higher dividend yield)

QualityHAL(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CCJ	HAL
P/E ratio	99.55	19.28●
Forward P/E	41.13	12.08●
P/S ratio	18.48	1.33●
P/B ratio	12.99	2.72●
PEG ratio	0.39	—
EV / EBITDA	54.38	8.64●
FCF yield	1.39%	5.69%●

Profitability

Metric	CCJ	HAL
Gross margin	29.79%●	15.31%
Operating margin	16.59%●	11.31%
Net margin	18.49%●	6.95%
ROE	13.00%	14.23%●
ROIC	4.77%	8.38%●

Dividends

Metric	CCJ	HAL
Dividend yield	0.16%	1.94%●
Payout ratio	17.49%	45.03%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CCJ	HAL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	13.99%●	11.51%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	37.38%●	-3.16%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	26.83%●	6.24%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	41.12%●	10.45%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CCJ or HAL?: It depends on your goal. value: HAL (lower P/E); growth: CCJ (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: HAL (higher dividend yield); quality: HAL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, HAL leads 9 to 7.
Is CCJ or HAL cheaper?: On trailing earnings, HAL is cheaper: CCJ trades at a 99.55 P/E and HAL at 19.28.
Which has grown faster, CCJ or HAL?: Over the past five years, CCJ grew revenue faster — CCJ at a 13.99% CAGR versus HAL at 11.51%.
Does CCJ or HAL pay a bigger dividend?: CCJ yields 0.16% and HAL yields 1.94% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CCJ or HAL more profitable?: CCJ runs the higher net margin — CCJ at 18.49% versus HAL at 6.95%.
Which has been the better investment, CCJ or HAL?: Over the past 10-year, CCJ delivered the higher annualized total return — CCJ at 26.37% versus HAL at -0.73%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CCJ analysis Full HAL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cameco P/E ratio Halliburton P/E ratio Cameco dividend yield Halliburton dividend yield Cameco ROE Halliburton ROE Cameco operating margin Halliburton operating margin Cameco revenue growth Halliburton revenue growth Cameco free cash flow Halliburton free cash flow

Cameco & Halliburton appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.