Which has the lower trailing P/E, CCJ or HAL?

HAL has the lower trailing P/E: CCJ trades at 160.00 and HAL at 17.19. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CCJ or HAL?

Over the past five years, CCJ grew revenue faster — CCJ at a 15.08% CAGR versus HAL at 10.85%.

Does CCJ or HAL pay a bigger dividend?

CCJ yields 0.18% and HAL yields 1.90% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CCJ or HAL more profitable?

CCJ runs the higher net margin — CCJ at 10.29% versus HAL at 7.16%.

How have CCJ and HAL total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CCJ delivered 27.73% and HAL delivered 0.37% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Cameco Corporation (CCJ) vs Halliburton Company (HAL)

A side-by-side comparison of Cameco Corporation and Halliburton Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CCJ

Cameco Corporation

$41.20B

$94.59EnergyDelayed quote: Sep 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

HAL

Halliburton Company

$27.44B

$32.85EnergyDelayed quote: Sep 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CCJ vs HAL

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CCJ +1095.2% (+28.2%/yr)HAL -1.4% (-0.1%/yr)CCJ compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CCJ HAL

CCJ vs HAL: by the numbers

•CCJ is the larger company ($41.20B vs $27.44B market cap).
•HAL trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (17.19 vs 160.00 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CCJ converts more revenue to profit (10.29% vs 7.16% net margin).
•CCJ grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.08% vs 10.85% CAGR).
•HAL pays the higher dividend yield (1.90% vs 0.18%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CCJ	HAL
P/E ratio	160.00	17.19
Forward P/E	N/A	14.03
P/S ratio	16.51	1.23
P/B ratio	8.20	2.49
EV / EBITDA	70.52	9.02
FCF yield	0.95%	6.29%

Profitability

Metric	CCJ	HAL
Gross margin	27.91%	15.11%
Operating margin	14.57%	11.44%
Net margin	10.29%	7.16%
ROE	5.11%	14.55%
ROIC	4.10%	9.86%

Dividends

Metric	CCJ	HAL
Dividend yield	0.18%	1.90%
Payout ratio	29.08%	35.58%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CCJ	HAL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	15.08%	10.85%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	37.38%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	16.00%	11.48%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	31.98%	15.15%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CCJ or HAL?: HAL has the lower trailing P/E: CCJ trades at 160.00 and HAL at 17.19. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CCJ or HAL?: Over the past five years, CCJ grew revenue faster — CCJ at a 15.08% CAGR versus HAL at 10.85%.
Does CCJ or HAL pay a bigger dividend?: CCJ yields 0.18% and HAL yields 1.90% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CCJ or HAL more profitable?: CCJ runs the higher net margin — CCJ at 10.29% versus HAL at 7.16%.
How have CCJ and HAL total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CCJ delivered 27.73% and HAL delivered 0.37% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CCJ analysis Full HAL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cameco P/E ratio Halliburton P/E ratio Cameco dividend yield Halliburton dividend yield Cameco ROE Halliburton ROE Cameco operating margin Halliburton operating margin Cameco revenue growth Halliburton revenue growth Cameco free cash flow Halliburton free cash flow

Cameco & Halliburton appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.