Which has the lower trailing P/E, CCJ or FANG?

FANG has the lower trailing P/E: CCJ trades at 148.98 and FANG at 36.46. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CCJ or FANG?

Over the past five years, FANG grew revenue faster — CCJ at a 15.08% CAGR versus FANG at 31.48%.

Does CCJ or FANG pay a bigger dividend?

CCJ yields 0.18% and FANG yields 2.07% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CCJ or FANG more profitable?

CCJ runs the higher net margin — CCJ at 10.29% versus FANG at 9.27%.

How have CCJ and FANG total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CCJ delivered 27.73% and FANG delivered 10.87% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Cameco Corporation (CCJ) vs Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG)

A side-by-side comparison of Cameco Corporation and Diamondback Energy, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CCJ

Cameco Corporation

$38.36B

$88.07EnergyDelayed quote: Sep 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

FANG

Diamondback Energy, Inc.

$52.51B

$186.67EnergyDelayed quote: Sep 25, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CCJ vs FANG

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CCJ +1016.1% (+27.3%/yr)FANG +196.8% (+11.5%/yr)CCJ compounded faster over this window

CCJ FANG

CCJ vs FANG: by the numbers

•FANG is the larger company ($52.51B vs $38.36B market cap).
•FANG trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (36.46 vs 148.98 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CCJ converts more revenue to profit (10.29% vs 9.27% net margin).
•FANG grew revenue faster over the past five years (31.48% vs 15.08% CAGR).
•FANG pays the higher dividend yield (2.07% vs 0.18%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CCJ	FANG
P/E ratio	148.98	36.46
P/S ratio	15.37	3.07
P/B ratio	7.63	1.39
EV / EBITDA	65.65	6.47
FCF yield	1.02%	12.37%

Profitability

Metric	CCJ	FANG
Gross margin	27.91%	35.16%
Operating margin	14.57%	27.68%
Net margin	10.29%	9.27%
ROE	5.11%	4.18%
ROIC	4.10%	5.88%

Dividends

Metric	CCJ	FANG
Dividend yield	0.18%	2.07%
Payout ratio	29.08%	83.01%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CCJ	FANG
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	15.08%	31.48%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	37.38%	25.44%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	16.00%	51.55%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	31.98%	27.56%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CCJ or FANG?: FANG has the lower trailing P/E: CCJ trades at 148.98 and FANG at 36.46. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CCJ or FANG?: Over the past five years, FANG grew revenue faster — CCJ at a 15.08% CAGR versus FANG at 31.48%.
Does CCJ or FANG pay a bigger dividend?: CCJ yields 0.18% and FANG yields 2.07% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CCJ or FANG more profitable?: CCJ runs the higher net margin — CCJ at 10.29% versus FANG at 9.27%.
How have CCJ and FANG total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CCJ delivered 27.73% and FANG delivered 10.87% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CCJ analysis Full FANG analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cameco P/E ratio Diamondback Energy P/E ratio Cameco dividend yield Diamondback Energy dividend yield Cameco ROE Diamondback Energy ROE Cameco operating margin Diamondback Energy operating margin Cameco revenue growth Diamondback Energy revenue growth Cameco free cash flow Diamondback Energy free cash flow

Cameco & Diamondback Energy appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.