Cameco Corporation (CCJ) vs Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG)

FANG leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics, though CCJ is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Cameco Corporation and Diamondback Energy, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Compare
Cameco Corporation logo
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
$45.51B
$104.49Energy
Diamondback Energy, Inc. logo
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
$50.61B
$179.91Energy

Total return — CCJ vs FANG

growth of $100 · last 14y
CCJ +444.2%FANG +928.1%FANG compounded faster
05001kStart $1002015201820212024$544$1,028
CCJ FANG

CCJ vs FANG: by the numbers

  • •FANG is the larger company ($50.61B vs $45.51B market cap).
  • •CCJ trades at the lower earnings multiple (95.52 vs 211.66 P/E).
  • •CCJ converts more revenue to profit (18.49% vs 2.65% net margin).
  • •FANG grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.44% vs 13.99% CAGR).
  • •FANG pays the higher dividend yield (2.45% vs 0.16%).

Which is better, CCJ or FANG?

Metric tally: CCJ 6 · FANG 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueCCJ(lower P/E)
GrowthFANG(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeFANG(higher dividend yield)
QualityFANG(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCCJFANG
P/E ratio95.52●211.66
Forward P/E39.61—
P/S ratio17.733.35●
P/B ratio12.471.39●
PEG ratio0.39●8.32
EV / EBITDA69.907.51●
FCF yield1.48%3.13%●

Profitability

MetricCCJFANG
Gross margin29.79%41.83%●
Operating margin16.59%32.73%●
Net margin18.49%●2.65%
ROE13.00%●1.10%
ROIC4.77%6.00%●

Dividends

MetricCCJFANG
Dividend yield0.16%2.45%●
Payout ratio17.49%76.79%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCCJFANG
Revenue CAGR (5Y)13.99%37.44%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)37.38%●25.44%
FCF CAGR (5Y)27.36%91.40%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)39.58%●18.00%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CCJ or FANG?
It depends on your goal. value: CCJ (lower P/E); growth: FANG (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: FANG (higher dividend yield); quality: FANG (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FANG leads 10 to 6.
Is CCJ or FANG cheaper?
On trailing earnings, CCJ is cheaper: CCJ trades at a 95.52 P/E and FANG at 211.66.
Which has grown faster, CCJ or FANG?
Over the past five years, FANG grew revenue faster — CCJ at a 13.99% CAGR versus FANG at 37.44%.
Does CCJ or FANG pay a bigger dividend?
CCJ yields 0.16% and FANG yields 2.45% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CCJ or FANG more profitable?
CCJ runs the higher net margin — CCJ at 18.49% versus FANG at 2.65%.
Which has been the better investment, CCJ or FANG?
Over the past 10-year, CCJ delivered the higher annualized total return — CCJ at 26.50% versus FANG at 10.32%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CCJ analysisFull FANG analysisInteractive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cameco P/E ratioDiamondback Energy P/E ratioCameco dividend yieldDiamondback Energy dividend yieldCameco ROEDiamondback Energy ROECameco operating marginDiamondback Energy operating marginCameco revenue growthDiamondback Energy revenue growthCameco free cash flowDiamondback Energy free cash flow

Cameco & Diamondback Energy appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield StocksFastest Revenue Growth StocksHighest Operating Margin StocksBest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.