Cameco Corporation (CCJ) vs Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG)

A side-by-side comparison of Cameco Corporation and Diamondback Energy, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total returnCCJ vs FANG

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
CCJ +1005.7% (+27.2%/yr)FANG +170.0% (+10.4%/yr)CCJ compounded faster over this window
05001k2kStart $10020182020202220242026$1,106$270
CCJ FANG

CCJ vs FANG: by the numbers

  • FANG is the larger company ($56.74B vs $43.00B market cap).
  • FANG trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (38.86 vs 164.61 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • CCJ converts more revenue to profit (10.29% vs 9.27% net margin).
  • FANG grew revenue faster over the past five years (31.48% vs 15.08% CAGR).
  • FANG pays the higher dividend yield (2.09% vs 0.18%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCCJFANG
P/E ratio164.6138.86
Forward P/E59.3810.04
P/S ratio16.983.27
P/B ratio8.441.48
EV / EBITDA72.566.82
FCF yield0.92%11.61%

Profitability

MetricCCJFANG
Gross margin27.91%35.16%
Operating margin14.57%27.68%
Net margin10.29%9.27%
ROE5.11%4.18%
ROIC4.77%6.00%

Dividends

MetricCCJFANG
Dividend yield0.18%2.09%
Payout ratio17.49%72.43%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCCJFANG
Revenue CAGR (5Y)15.08%31.48%
EPS CAGR (5Y)37.38%25.44%
FCF CAGR (5Y)16.00%51.55%
Total return CAGR (5Y)41.16%25.81%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CCJ or FANG?
FANG has the lower trailing P/E: CCJ trades at 164.61 and FANG at 38.86. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CCJ or FANG?
Over the past five years, FANG grew revenue faster — CCJ at a 15.08% CAGR versus FANG at 31.48%.
Does CCJ or FANG pay a bigger dividend?
CCJ yields 0.18% and FANG yields 2.09% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CCJ or FANG more profitable?
CCJ runs the higher net margin — CCJ at 10.29% versus FANG at 9.27%.
How have CCJ and FANG total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, CCJ delivered 27.26% and FANG delivered 10.81% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 11, 2026.