Cameco Corporation (CCJ) vs Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG)
A side-by-side comparison of Cameco Corporation and Diamondback Energy, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
$98.73EnergyDelayed quote: Aug 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
$201.71EnergyDelayed quote: Aug 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CCJ vs FANG
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCCJ +1005.7% (+27.2%/yr)FANG +170.0% (+10.4%/yr)CCJ compounded faster over this window
CCJ FANG
CCJ vs FANG: by the numbers
- •FANG is the larger company ($56.74B vs $43.00B market cap).
- •FANG trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (38.86 vs 164.61 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CCJ converts more revenue to profit (10.29% vs 9.27% net margin).
- •FANG grew revenue faster over the past five years (31.48% vs 15.08% CAGR).
- •FANG pays the higher dividend yield (2.09% vs 0.18%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CCJ | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 164.61 | 38.86 |
| Forward P/E | 59.38 | 10.04 |
| P/S ratio | 16.98 | 3.27 |
| P/B ratio | 8.44 | 1.48 |
| EV / EBITDA | 72.56 | 6.82 |
| FCF yield | 0.92% | 11.61% |
Profitability
| Metric | CCJ | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 27.91% | 35.16% |
| Operating margin | 14.57% | 27.68% |
| Net margin | 10.29% | 9.27% |
| ROE | 5.11% | 4.18% |
| ROIC | 4.77% | 6.00% |
Dividends
| Metric | CCJ | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.18% | 2.09% |
| Payout ratio | 17.49% | 72.43% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CCJ | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.08% | 31.48% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 37.38% | 25.44% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 16.00% | 51.55% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 41.16% | 25.81% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CCJ or FANG?
- FANG has the lower trailing P/E: CCJ trades at 164.61 and FANG at 38.86. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CCJ or FANG?
- Over the past five years, FANG grew revenue faster — CCJ at a 15.08% CAGR versus FANG at 31.48%.
- Does CCJ or FANG pay a bigger dividend?
- CCJ yields 0.18% and FANG yields 2.09% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CCJ or FANG more profitable?
- CCJ runs the higher net margin — CCJ at 10.29% versus FANG at 9.27%.
- How have CCJ and FANG total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CCJ delivered 27.26% and FANG delivered 10.81% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Cameco P/E ratioDiamondback Energy P/E ratioCameco dividend yieldDiamondback Energy dividend yieldCameco ROEDiamondback Energy ROECameco operating marginDiamondback Energy operating marginCameco revenue growthDiamondback Energy revenue growthCameco free cash flowDiamondback Energy free cash flow
Cameco & Diamondback Energy appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 11, 2026.