Is CCJ or EXE cheaper?

On trailing earnings, EXE is cheaper: CCJ trades at a 78.27 P/E and EXE at 6.49.

Which has grown faster, CCJ or EXE?

Over the past five years, EXE grew revenue faster — CCJ at a 13.99% CAGR versus EXE at 27.70%.

Does CCJ or EXE pay a bigger dividend?

CCJ yields 0.20% and EXE yields 3.67% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CCJ or EXE more profitable?

EXE runs the higher net margin — CCJ at 18.49% versus EXE at 22.89%.

Which has been the better investment, CCJ or EXE?

Over the past 5-year, CCJ delivered the higher annualized total return — CCJ at 24.08% versus EXE at 16.62%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Cameco Corporation (CCJ) vs Expand Energy Corporation (EXE)

EXE leads on 14 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Cameco Corporation and Expand Energy Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

CCJ

Cameco Corporation

$36.95B

$84.85EnergyDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

EXE

Expand Energy Corporation

$20.80B

$86.95EnergyDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CCJ vs EXE

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5y

CCJ +422.5%EXE +157.8%CCJ compounded faster

CCJ EXE

CCJ vs EXE: by the numbers

•CCJ is the larger company ($36.95B vs $20.80B market cap).
•EXE trades at the lower earnings multiple (6.49 vs 78.27 P/E).
•EXE converts more revenue to profit (22.89% vs 18.49% net margin).
•EXE grew revenue faster over the past five years (27.70% vs 13.99% CAGR).
•EXE pays the higher dividend yield (3.67% vs 0.20%).

Which is better, CCJ or EXE?

Metric tally: CCJ 1 · EXE 14

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueEXE(lower P/E)

GrowthEXE(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeEXE(higher dividend yield)

QualityEXE(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CCJ	EXE
P/E ratio	78.27	6.49●
Forward P/E	52.71	10.18●
P/S ratio	14.53	1.49●
P/B ratio	10.22	1.07●
PEG ratio	0.39	—
EV / EBITDA	57.27	3.37●
FCF yield	1.81%	13.68%●

Profitability

Metric	CCJ	EXE
Gross margin	29.79%	53.38%●
Operating margin	16.59%	17.49%●
Net margin	18.49%	22.89%●
ROE	13.00%	16.51%●
ROIC	4.77%	6.38%●

Dividends

Metric	CCJ	EXE
Dividend yield	0.20%	3.67%●
Payout ratio	17.49%	41.59%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CCJ	EXE
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	13.99%	27.70%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	37.38%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	27.36%	49.16%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	38.70%●	16.62%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CCJ or EXE?: It depends on your goal. value: EXE (lower P/E); growth: EXE (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: EXE (higher dividend yield); quality: EXE (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, EXE leads 14 to 1.
Is CCJ or EXE cheaper?: On trailing earnings, EXE is cheaper: CCJ trades at a 78.27 P/E and EXE at 6.49.
Which has grown faster, CCJ or EXE?: Over the past five years, EXE grew revenue faster — CCJ at a 13.99% CAGR versus EXE at 27.70%.
Does CCJ or EXE pay a bigger dividend?: CCJ yields 0.20% and EXE yields 3.67% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CCJ or EXE more profitable?: EXE runs the higher net margin — CCJ at 18.49% versus EXE at 22.89%.
Which has been the better investment, CCJ or EXE?: Over the past 5-year, CCJ delivered the higher annualized total return — CCJ at 24.08% versus EXE at 16.62%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CCJ analysis Full EXE analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cameco P/E ratio Expand Energy P/E ratio Cameco dividend yield Expand Energy dividend yield Cameco ROE Expand Energy ROE Cameco operating margin Expand Energy operating margin Cameco revenue growth Expand Energy revenue growth Cameco free cash flow Expand Energy free cash flow

Cameco & Expand Energy appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 20, 2026.