Which has the lower trailing P/E, CCJ or EQT?

EQT has the lower trailing P/E: CCJ trades at 154.39 and EQT at 11.73. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CCJ or EQT?

Over the past five years, EQT grew revenue faster — CCJ at a 15.08% CAGR versus EQT at 20.44%.

Does CCJ or EQT pay a bigger dividend?

CCJ yields 0.18% and EQT yields 1.22% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CCJ or EQT more profitable?

EQT runs the higher net margin — CCJ at 10.29% versus EQT at 30.68%.

How have CCJ and EQT total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CCJ delivered 27.73% and EQT delivered 4.15% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Cameco Corporation (CCJ) vs EQT Corporation (EQT)

A side-by-side comparison of Cameco Corporation and EQT Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CCJ

Cameco Corporation

$39.75B

$91.27EnergyDelayed quote: Sep 15, 2026, 2:25 PM EDT

EQT

EQT Corporation

$33.31B

$53.26EnergyDelayed quote: Sep 15, 2026, 2:25 PM EDT

Total return — CCJ vs EQT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CCJ +1095.2% (+28.2%/yr)EQT +47.9% (+4.0%/yr)CCJ compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CCJ EQT

CCJ vs EQT: by the numbers

•CCJ is the larger company ($39.75B vs $33.31B market cap).
•EQT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.73 vs 154.39 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•EQT converts more revenue to profit (30.68% vs 10.29% net margin).
•EQT grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.44% vs 15.08% CAGR).
•EQT pays the higher dividend yield (1.22% vs 0.18%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CCJ	EQT
P/E ratio	154.39	11.73
Forward P/E	N/A	13.09
P/S ratio	15.93	3.59
P/B ratio	7.91	1.32
EV / EBITDA	68.04	5.79
FCF yield	0.98%	11.31%

Profitability

Metric	CCJ	EQT
Gross margin	27.91%	48.86%
Operating margin	14.57%	34.70%
Net margin	10.29%	30.68%
ROE	5.11%	11.28%
ROIC	4.10%	7.85%

Dividends

Metric	CCJ	EQT
Dividend yield	0.18%	1.22%
Payout ratio	29.08%	14.54%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CCJ	EQT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	15.08%	20.44%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	37.38%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	16.00%	157.06%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	31.98%	24.50%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CCJ or EQT?: EQT has the lower trailing P/E: CCJ trades at 154.39 and EQT at 11.73. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CCJ or EQT?: Over the past five years, EQT grew revenue faster — CCJ at a 15.08% CAGR versus EQT at 20.44%.
Does CCJ or EQT pay a bigger dividend?: CCJ yields 0.18% and EQT yields 1.22% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CCJ or EQT more profitable?: EQT runs the higher net margin — CCJ at 10.29% versus EQT at 30.68%.
How have CCJ and EQT total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CCJ delivered 27.73% and EQT delivered 4.15% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CCJ analysis Full EQT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cameco P/E ratio EQT P/E ratio Cameco dividend yield EQT dividend yield Cameco ROE EQT ROE Cameco operating margin EQT operating margin Cameco revenue growth EQT revenue growth Cameco free cash flow EQT free cash flow

Cameco & EQT appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.