Cameco Corporation (CCJ) vs Celestica Inc. (CLS)
A side-by-side comparison of Cameco Corporation and Celestica Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CCJ is classified in Energy; CLS is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
$86.96EnergyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$350.20TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CCJ vs CLS
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 28yCCJ +2822.9%CLS +3522.3%CLS compounded faster
CCJ CLS
CCJ vs CLS: by the numbers
- •CLS is the larger company ($40.26B vs $37.87B market cap).
- •CLS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (33.05 vs 81.68 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CCJ converts more revenue to profit (18.49% vs 7.16% net margin).
- •CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 13.99% CAGR).
- •CCJ pays a dividend (0.19% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CCJ | CLS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 81.68 | 33.05 |
| Forward P/E | 54.66 | 31.47 |
| P/S ratio | 15.16 | 2.37 |
| P/B ratio | 10.66 | 14.91 |
| PEG ratio | 0.39 | 0.39 |
| EV / EBITDA | 59.76 | 26.58 |
| FCF yield | 1.73% | 1.41% |
Profitability
| Metric | CCJ | CLS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 29.79% | 11.59% |
| Operating margin | 16.59% | 8.13% |
| Net margin | 18.49% | 7.16% |
| ROE | 13.00% | 45.07% |
| ROIC | 4.77% | 27.74% |
Dividends
| Metric | CCJ | CLS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.19% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 17.49% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CCJ | CLS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 13.99% | 22.80% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 37.38% | 73.33% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 27.36% | 29.00% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 39.64% | 105.32% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CCJ or CLS?
- CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CCJ trades at 81.68 and CLS at 33.05. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CCJ or CLS?
- Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CCJ at a 13.99% CAGR versus CLS at 22.80%.
- Does CCJ or CLS pay a bigger dividend?
- CCJ pays a dividend (0.19% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CCJ or CLS more profitable?
- CCJ runs the higher net margin — CCJ at 18.49% versus CLS at 7.16%.
- How have CCJ and CLS total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CCJ delivered 24.70% and CLS delivered 40.11% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Cameco P/E ratioCelestica P/E ratioCameco dividend yieldCelestica dividend yieldCameco ROECelestica ROECameco operating marginCelestica operating marginCameco revenue growthCelestica revenue growthCameco free cash flowCelestica free cash flow
Cameco & Celestica appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.