Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (CCEP) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST)
CCEP leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC and Monster Beverage Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 21, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC
$106.14Consumer DefensiveAt close: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$95.45Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CCEP vs MNST
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yCCEP +1479.0%MNST +397197.5%MNST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CCEP MNST
CCEP vs MNST: by the numbers
- •MNST is the larger company ($93.35B vs $47.04B market cap).
- •CCEP trades at the lower earnings multiple (12.88 vs 47.10 P/E).
- •MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.11% vs 8.20% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.96% vs 12.07% CAGR).
- •CCEP pays a dividend (2.27% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
Which is better, CCEP or MNST?
Metric tally: CCEP 11 · MNST 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCCEP(lower P/E)
GrowthMNST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityMNST(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CCEP | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 12.88● | 47.10 |
| Forward P/E | 23.84● | 42.38 |
| P/S ratio | 1.04● | 10.96 |
| P/B ratio | 5.18● | 11.04 |
| PEG ratio | 0.58● | 1.31 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.52● | 34.96 |
| FCF yield | 10.29%● | 2.15% |
Profitability
| Metric | CCEP | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 35.60% | 55.47%● |
| Operating margin | 12.00% | 29.34%● |
| Net margin | 8.20% | 23.11%● |
| ROE | 41.02%● | 23.28% |
| ROIC | 9.45% | 21.74%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CCEP | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.27% | — |
| Payout ratio | 50.06% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CCEP | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.07% | 12.96%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 29.26%● | 7.95% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 13.59%● | 10.53% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 16.21%● | 15.35% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CCEP or MNST?
- It depends on your goal. value: CCEP (lower P/E); growth: MNST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MNST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CCEP leads 11 to 5.
- Is CCEP or MNST cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CCEP is cheaper: CCEP trades at a 12.88 P/E and MNST at 47.10.
- Which has grown faster, CCEP or MNST?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — CCEP at a 12.07% CAGR versus MNST at 12.96%.
- Does CCEP or MNST pay a bigger dividend?
- CCEP pays a dividend (2.27% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
- Is CCEP or MNST more profitable?
- MNST runs the higher net margin — CCEP at 8.20% versus MNST at 23.11%.
- Which has been the better investment, CCEP or MNST?
- Over the past 10-year, CCEP delivered the higher annualized total return — CCEP at 13.92% versus MNST at 13.77%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners P/E ratioMonster Beverage P/E ratioCoca-Cola Europacific Partners dividend yieldMonster Beverage dividend yieldCoca-Cola Europacific Partners ROEMonster Beverage ROECoca-Cola Europacific Partners operating marginMonster Beverage operating marginCoca-Cola Europacific Partners revenue growthMonster Beverage revenue growthCoca-Cola Europacific Partners free cash flowMonster Beverage free cash flow
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners & Monster Beverage appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 21, 2026.