Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE) vs Regions Financial Corporation (RF)
CBOE and RF are evenly matched — 7 metrics each of 14.
A side-by-side comparison of Cboe Global Markets, Inc. and Regions Financial Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CBOE
Cboe Global Markets, Inc.
$242.21Financial Services
RF
Regions Financial Corporation
$29.98Financial Services
Total return — CBOE vs RF
growth of $100 · last 16yCBOE +645.5%RF +318.6%CBOE compounded faster
CBOE RF
CBOE vs RF: by the numbers
- •RF is the larger company ($25.58B vs $25.35B market cap).
- •RF trades at the lower earnings multiple (12.49 vs 20.68 P/E).
- •CBOE converts more revenue to profit (25.77% vs 23.13% net margin).
- •RF grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.48% vs 6.39% CAGR).
- •RF pays the higher dividend yield (3.54% vs 1.19%).
Which is better, CBOE or RF?
Metric tally: CBOE 7 · RF 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueRF(lower P/E)
GrowthRF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeRF(higher dividend yield)
QualityCBOE(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CBOE | RF |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 20.68 | 12.49● |
| Forward P/E | 16.87 | 11.46● |
| P/S ratio | 5.31 | 2.71● |
| P/B ratio | 4.73 | 1.39● |
| PEG ratio | 0.54● | 0.62 |
Profitability
| Metric | CBOE | RF |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 52.22% | 75.81%● |
| Operating margin | 34.30%● | 29.48% |
| Net margin | 25.77%● | 23.13% |
| ROE | 22.99%● | 11.85% |
| ROIC | 15.31%● | 13.79% |
Dividends
| Metric | CBOE | RF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.19% | 3.54%● |
| Payout ratio | 27.53% | 45.89% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CBOE | RF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.39% | 7.48%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 19.57%● | 17.53% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 16.28%● | 12.30% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CBOE or RF?
- It depends on your goal. value: RF (lower P/E); growth: RF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: RF (higher dividend yield); quality: CBOE (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is CBOE or RF cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, RF is cheaper: CBOE trades at a 20.68 P/E and RF at 12.49.
- Which has grown faster, CBOE or RF?
- Over the past five years, RF grew revenue faster — CBOE at a 6.39% CAGR versus RF at 7.48%.
- Does CBOE or RF pay a bigger dividend?
- CBOE yields 1.19% and RF yields 3.54% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CBOE or RF more profitable?
- CBOE runs the higher net margin — CBOE at 25.77% versus RF at 23.13%.
- Which has been the better investment, CBOE or RF?
- Over the past 10-year, RF delivered the higher annualized total return — CBOE at 15.60% versus RF at 17.57%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Cboe Global Markets P/E ratioRegions Financial P/E ratioCboe Global Markets dividend yieldRegions Financial dividend yieldCboe Global Markets ROERegions Financial ROECboe Global Markets operating marginRegions Financial operating marginCboe Global Markets revenue growthRegions Financial revenue growthCboe Global Markets free cash flowRegions Financial free cash flow
Cboe Global Markets & Regions Financial appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.