Is CAT or SIEGY cheaper?

On trailing earnings, SIEGY is cheaper: CAT trades at a 47.04 P/E and SIEGY at 27.37.

Which has grown faster, CAT or SIEGY?

Over the past five years, CAT grew revenue faster — CAT at a 10.47% CAGR versus SIEGY at 6.96%.

Does CAT or SIEGY pay a bigger dividend?

CAT yields 0.64% and SIEGY yields 2.02% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CAT or SIEGY more profitable?

CAT runs the higher net margin — CAT at 13.31% versus SIEGY at 9.69%.

Which has been the better investment, CAT or SIEGY?

Over the past 10-year, CAT delivered the higher annualized total return — CAT at 31.91% versus SIEGY at 16.04%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) vs Siemens AG (SIEGY)

SIEGY leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Caterpillar Inc. and Siemens AG across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — CAT vs SIEGY

growth of $100 · last 30y

CAT +4972.9%SIEGY +870.7%CAT compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CAT SIEGY

CAT vs SIEGY: by the numbers

•CAT is the larger company ($445.28B vs $241.46B market cap).
•SIEGY trades at the lower earnings multiple (27.37 vs 47.04 P/E).
•CAT converts more revenue to profit (13.31% vs 9.69% net margin).
•CAT grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.47% vs 6.96% CAGR).
•SIEGY pays the higher dividend yield (2.02% vs 0.64%).

Which is better, CAT or SIEGY?

Metric tally: CAT 8 · SIEGY 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueSIEGY(lower P/E)

GrowthCAT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeSIEGY(higher dividend yield)

QualityCAT(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CAT	SIEGY
P/E ratio	47.04	27.37●
Forward P/E	38.34	24.57●
P/S ratio	6.22	2.63●
P/B ratio	23.60	3.31●
PEG ratio	1.68	1.06●
EV / EBITDA	30.12	17.57●
FCF yield	2.60%	4.72%●

Profitability

Metric	CAT	SIEGY
Gross margin	32.52%	38.85%●
Operating margin	16.56%●	11.70%
Net margin	13.31%●	9.69%
ROE	50.48%●	12.19%
ROIC	11.42%●	5.37%

Dividends

Metric	CAT	SIEGY
Dividend yield	0.64%	2.02%●
Payout ratio	31.96%	44.02%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CAT	SIEGY
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	10.47%●	6.96%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	27.96%●	19.68%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	17.77%●	2.12%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	38.21%●	16.69%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CAT or SIEGY?: It depends on your goal. value: SIEGY (lower P/E); growth: CAT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SIEGY (higher dividend yield); quality: CAT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SIEGY leads 9 to 8.
Is CAT or SIEGY cheaper?: On trailing earnings, SIEGY is cheaper: CAT trades at a 47.04 P/E and SIEGY at 27.37.
Which has grown faster, CAT or SIEGY?: Over the past five years, CAT grew revenue faster — CAT at a 10.47% CAGR versus SIEGY at 6.96%.
Does CAT or SIEGY pay a bigger dividend?: CAT yields 0.64% and SIEGY yields 2.02% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CAT or SIEGY more profitable?: CAT runs the higher net margin — CAT at 13.31% versus SIEGY at 9.69%.
Which has been the better investment, CAT or SIEGY?: Over the past 10-year, CAT delivered the higher annualized total return — CAT at 31.91% versus SIEGY at 16.04%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CAT analysis Full SIEGY analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Caterpillar P/E ratio Siemens AG P/E ratio Caterpillar dividend yield Siemens AG dividend yield Caterpillar ROE Siemens AG ROE Caterpillar operating margin Siemens AG operating margin Caterpillar revenue growth Siemens AG revenue growth Caterpillar free cash flow Siemens AG free cash flow

Caterpillar & Siemens AG appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 17, 2026.