Which has the lower trailing P/E, CART or SIMO?

SIMO has the lower trailing P/E: CART trades at 24.18 and SIMO at 8.21. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CART or SIMO?

Over the past five years, CART grew revenue faster — CART at a 20.44% CAGR versus SIMO at 14.30%.

Does CART or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?

SIMO pays a dividend (0.71% yield), while CART has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is CART or SIMO more profitable?

SIMO runs the higher net margin — CART at 12.02% versus SIMO at 22.06%.

Maplebear Inc. (CART) vs Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO)

A side-by-side comparison of Maplebear Inc. and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 4, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CART

Maplebear Inc.

$10.40B

$44.25TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

SIMO

Silicon Motion Technology Corporation

$9.41B

$280.50TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CART vs SIMO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 3y

CART +31.3% (+9.5%/yr)SIMO +485.9% (+80.3%/yr)SIMO compounded faster over this window

CART SIMO

CART vs SIMO: by the numbers

•CART is the larger company ($10.40B vs $9.41B market cap).
•SIMO trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (8.21 vs 24.18 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•SIMO converts more revenue to profit (22.06% vs 12.02% net margin).
•CART grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.44% vs 14.30% CAGR).
•SIMO pays a dividend (0.71% yield), while CART has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CART	SIMO
P/E ratio	24.18	8.21
Forward P/E	18.98	25.07
PEG ratio	N/A	0.18
P/S ratio	2.60	7.17
P/B ratio	4.48	8.99
EV / EBITDA	13.69	37.89
FCF yield	11.30%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	CART	SIMO
Gross margin	72.43%	48.87%
Operating margin	14.80%	16.31%
Net margin	12.02%	22.06%
ROE	20.67%	27.68%
ROIC	17.59%	14.77%

Dividends

Metric	CART	SIMO
Dividend yield	N/A	0.71%
Payout ratio	N/A	5.85%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CART	SIMO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	20.44%	14.30%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	44.85%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	N/A	35.29%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CART or SIMO?: SIMO has the lower trailing P/E: CART trades at 24.18 and SIMO at 8.21. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CART or SIMO?: Over the past five years, CART grew revenue faster — CART at a 20.44% CAGR versus SIMO at 14.30%.
Does CART or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?: SIMO pays a dividend (0.71% yield), while CART has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CART or SIMO more profitable?: SIMO runs the higher net margin — CART at 12.02% versus SIMO at 22.06%.

Go deeper

Full CART analysis Full SIMO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Maplebear P/E ratio Silicon Motion Technology P/E ratio Silicon Motion Technology dividend yield Maplebear ROE Silicon Motion Technology ROE Maplebear operating margin Silicon Motion Technology operating margin Maplebear revenue growth Silicon Motion Technology revenue growth Maplebear free cash flow Silicon Motion Technology free cash flow

Maplebear & Silicon Motion Technology appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 4, 2026.