Carrier Global Corporation (CARR) vs W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW)
GWW leads on 10 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Carrier Global Corporation and W.W. Grainger, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CARR
Carrier Global Corporation
$74.06Industrials
GWW
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
$1374.78Industrials
Total return — CARR vs GWW
growth of $100 · last 6yCARR +517.2%GWW +469.2%CARR compounded faster
CARR GWW
CARR vs GWW: by the numbers
- •GWW is the larger company ($64.91B vs $61.51B market cap).
- •GWW trades at the lower earnings multiple (36.96 vs 48.09 P/E).
- •GWW converts more revenue to profit (9.70% vs 5.99% net margin).
- •GWW grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.12% vs 3.67% CAGR).
- •CARR pays the higher dividend yield (1.26% vs 0.67%).
Which is better, CARR or GWW?
Metric tally: CARR 5 · GWW 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueGWW(lower P/E)
GrowthGWW(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCARR(higher dividend yield)
QualityGWW(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CARR | GWW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 48.09 | 36.96● |
| Forward P/E | 23.15● | 30.14 |
| P/S ratio | 2.85● | 3.55 |
| P/B ratio | 4.64● | 16.58 |
| PEG ratio | — | 1.66 |
| EV / EBITDA | 23.27 | 23.32 |
| FCF yield | 2.66%● | 2.12% |
Profitability
| Metric | CARR | GWW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 24.80% | 39.15%● |
| Operating margin | 7.24% | 14.23%● |
| Net margin | 5.99% | 9.70%● |
| ROE | 9.74% | 45.34%● |
| ROIC | 5.41% | 27.73%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CARR | GWW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.26%● | 0.67% |
| Payout ratio | 53.45% | 26.13% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CARR | GWW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.67% | 9.12%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -5.35% | 22.25%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 1.87% | 7.67%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 11.37% | 26.72%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CARR or GWW?
- It depends on your goal. value: GWW (lower P/E); growth: GWW (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CARR (higher dividend yield); quality: GWW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GWW leads 10 to 5.
- Is CARR or GWW cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, GWW is cheaper: CARR trades at a 48.09 P/E and GWW at 36.96.
- Which has grown faster, CARR or GWW?
- Over the past five years, GWW grew revenue faster — CARR at a 3.67% CAGR versus GWW at 9.12%.
- Does CARR or GWW pay a bigger dividend?
- CARR yields 1.26% and GWW yields 0.67% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CARR or GWW more profitable?
- GWW runs the higher net margin — CARR at 5.99% versus GWW at 9.70%.
- Which has been the better investment, CARR or GWW?
- Over the past 5-year, GWW delivered the higher annualized total return — CARR at 11.37% versus GWW at 22.08%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Carrier Global P/E ratioW.W. Grainger P/E ratioCarrier Global dividend yieldW.W. Grainger dividend yieldCarrier Global ROEW.W. Grainger ROECarrier Global operating marginW.W. Grainger operating marginCarrier Global revenue growthW.W. Grainger revenue growthCarrier Global free cash flowW.W. Grainger free cash flow
Carrier Global & W.W. Grainger appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.