Camtek Ltd. (CAMT) vs TeraWulf Inc. (WULF)

A side-by-side comparison of Camtek Ltd. and TeraWulf Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 9, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total returnCAMT vs WULF

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 26y
CAMT +2689.9%WULF +503.4%CAMT compounded faster
01k2k3kStart $10020052010201520202025$2,790$603
CAMT WULF

CAMT vs WULF: by the numbers

  • WULF is the larger company ($8.46B vs $7.25B market cap).
  • CAMT is profitable (9.63% net margin) while WULF runs a net loss (-838.83%).
  • WULF grew revenue faster over the past five years (63.10% vs 22.22% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCAMTWULF
P/E ratio182.76N/A
P/S ratio16.0247.52
P/B ratio11.7248.35
PEG ratio12.12N/A
EV / EBITDA67.48N/A
FCF yield0.86%N/A

Profitability

MetricCAMTWULF
Gross margin50.23%50.93%
Operating margin24.60%-101.10%
Net margin9.63%-838.83%
ROE7.04%-470.94%
ROIC10.78%-3.18%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCAMTWULF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)22.22%63.10%
EPS CAGR (5Y)15.08%-27.04%
FCF CAGR (5Y)40.44%-2.15%
Total return CAGR (5Y)33.19%-1.21%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, CAMT or WULF?
Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — CAMT at a 22.22% CAGR versus WULF at 63.10%.
Is CAMT or WULF more profitable?
CAMT runs the higher net margin — CAMT at 9.63% versus WULF at -838.83%.
How have CAMT and WULF total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, CAMT delivered 51.64% and WULF delivered 5.03% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 9, 2026.