Which has the lower trailing P/E, CAMT or PATH?

PATH has the lower trailing P/E: CAMT trades at 239.08 and PATH at 20.16. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CAMT or PATH?

Over the past five years, CAMT grew revenue faster — CAMT at a 18.98% CAGR versus PATH at 18.49%.

Is CAMT or PATH more profitable?

PATH runs the higher net margin — CAMT at 7.40% versus PATH at 21.03%.

How have CAMT and PATH total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, CAMT delivered 29.54% and PATH delivered -24.30% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Camtek Ltd. (CAMT) vs UiPath Inc. (PATH)

A side-by-side comparison of Camtek Ltd. and UiPath Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CAMT

Camtek Ltd.

$6.80B

$145.84TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 18, 2026, 2:09 PM EDT

PATH

UiPath Inc.

$7.18B

$13.51TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 18, 2026, 2:10 PM EDT

Total return — CAMT vs PATH

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5y

CAMT +346.9% (+34.9%/yr)PATH -80.1% (-27.6%/yr)CAMT compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CAMT PATH

CAMT vs PATH: by the numbers

•PATH is the larger company ($7.18B vs $6.80B market cap).
•PATH trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (20.16 vs 239.08 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PATH converts more revenue to profit (21.03% vs 7.40% net margin).
•CAMT grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.98% vs 18.49% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CAMT	PATH
P/E ratio	239.08	20.16
Forward P/E	N/A	17.19
P/S ratio	13.37	4.17
P/B ratio	9.58	3.69
EV / EBITDA	N/A	36.64
FCF yield	N/A	5.05%

Profitability

Metric	CAMT	PATH
Gross margin	50.05%	82.50%
Operating margin	23.19%	9.03%
Net margin	7.40%	21.03%
ROE	5.30%	18.57%
ROIC	7.81%	7.40%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CAMT	PATH
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	18.98%	18.49%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	15.08%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	40.44%	60.31%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	29.54%	-24.30%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CAMT or PATH?: PATH has the lower trailing P/E: CAMT trades at 239.08 and PATH at 20.16. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CAMT or PATH?: Over the past five years, CAMT grew revenue faster — CAMT at a 18.98% CAGR versus PATH at 18.49%.
Is CAMT or PATH more profitable?: PATH runs the higher net margin — CAMT at 7.40% versus PATH at 21.03%.
How have CAMT and PATH total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, CAMT delivered 29.54% and PATH delivered -24.30% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CAMT analysis Full PATH analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Camtek P/E ratio UiPath P/E ratio Camtek ROE UiPath ROE Camtek operating margin UiPath operating margin Camtek revenue growth UiPath revenue growth Camtek free cash flow UiPath free cash flow

Camtek & UiPath appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.