Is CAMT or PATH cheaper?

On trailing earnings, PATH is cheaper: CAMT trades at a 209.58 P/E and PATH at 16.97.

Which has grown faster, CAMT or PATH?

Over the past five years, CAMT grew revenue faster — CAMT at a 22.22% CAGR versus PATH at 19.70%.

Is CAMT or PATH more profitable?

PATH runs the higher net margin — CAMT at 9.63% versus PATH at 19.58%.

Which has been the better investment, CAMT or PATH?

Over the past 5-year, CAMT delivered the higher annualized total return — CAMT at 57.08% versus PATH at -31.93%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Camtek Ltd. (CAMT) vs UiPath Inc. (PATH)

PATH leads on 8 of 12 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Camtek Ltd. and UiPath Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 18, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — CAMT vs PATH

growth of $100 · last 5y

CAMT +456.7%PATH -85.2%CAMT compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CAMT PATH

CAMT vs PATH: by the numbers

•CAMT is the larger company ($8.20B vs $5.44B market cap).
•PATH trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.97 vs 209.58 P/E).
•PATH converts more revenue to profit (19.58% vs 9.63% net margin).
•CAMT grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.22% vs 19.70% CAGR).

Which is better, CAMT or PATH?

Metric tally: CAMT 4 · PATH 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValuePATH(lower P/E)

GrowthCAMT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityCAMT(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CAMT	PATH
P/E ratio	209.58	16.97●
Forward P/E	—	15.19
P/S ratio	18.37	3.23●
P/B ratio	13.43	2.84●
PEG ratio	13.90	—
EV / EBITDA	259.02	30.28●
FCF yield	—	6.95%

Profitability

Metric	CAMT	PATH
Gross margin	50.23%	82.96%●
Operating margin	24.60%●	6.19%
Net margin	9.63%	19.58%●
ROE	7.04%	17.21%●
ROIC	10.78%●	2.67%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CAMT	PATH
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	22.22%●	19.70%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	15.08%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	21.78%	65.27%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	37.49%●	-31.93%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CAMT or PATH?: It depends on your goal. value: PATH (lower P/E); growth: CAMT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CAMT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PATH leads 8 to 4.
Is CAMT or PATH cheaper?: On trailing earnings, PATH is cheaper: CAMT trades at a 209.58 P/E and PATH at 16.97.
Which has grown faster, CAMT or PATH?: Over the past five years, CAMT grew revenue faster — CAMT at a 22.22% CAGR versus PATH at 19.70%.
Is CAMT or PATH more profitable?: PATH runs the higher net margin — CAMT at 9.63% versus PATH at 19.58%.
Which has been the better investment, CAMT or PATH?: Over the past 5-year, CAMT delivered the higher annualized total return — CAMT at 57.08% versus PATH at -31.93%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CAMT analysis Full PATH analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Camtek P/E ratio UiPath P/E ratio Camtek dividend yield UiPath dividend yield Camtek ROE UiPath ROE Camtek operating margin UiPath operating margin Camtek revenue growth UiPath revenue growth Camtek free cash flow UiPath free cash flow

Camtek & UiPath appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 18, 2026.