Is CAMT or HUBS cheaper?

On trailing earnings, HUBS is cheaper: CAMT trades at a 227.38 P/E and HUBS at 98.51.

Which has grown faster, CAMT or HUBS?

Over the past five years, HUBS grew revenue faster — CAMT at a 22.22% CAGR versus HUBS at 27.85%.

Is CAMT or HUBS more profitable?

CAMT runs the higher net margin — CAMT at 9.63% versus HUBS at 3.04%.

Which has been the better investment, CAMT or HUBS?

Over the past 10-year, CAMT delivered the higher annualized total return — CAMT at 58.63% versus HUBS at 14.37%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Camtek Ltd. (CAMT) vs HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS)

HUBS leads on 8 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Camtek Ltd. and HubSpot, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — CAMT vs HUBS

growth of $100 · last 12y

CAMT +5703.9%HUBS +547.1%CAMT compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CAMT HUBS

CAMT vs HUBS: by the numbers

•HUBS is the larger company ($9.63B vs $8.86B market cap).
•HUBS trades at the lower earnings multiple (98.51 vs 227.38 P/E).
•CAMT converts more revenue to profit (9.63% vs 3.04% net margin).
•HUBS grew revenue faster over the past five years (27.85% vs 22.22% CAGR).

Which is better, CAMT or HUBS?

Metric tally: CAMT 5 · HUBS 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueHUBS(lower P/E)

GrowthHUBS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityCAMT(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	CAMT	HUBS
P/E ratio	227.38	98.51●
P/S ratio	19.93	3.00●
P/B ratio	14.57	4.95●
PEG ratio	15.08	0.52●
EV / EBITDA	280.35	35.09●
FCF yield	—	7.21%

Profitability

Metric	CAMT	HUBS
Gross margin	50.23%	83.65%●
Operating margin	24.60%●	1.95%
Net margin	9.63%●	3.04%
ROE	7.04%●	5.02%
ROIC	10.78%●	0.31%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CAMT	HUBS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	22.22%	27.85%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	15.08%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	21.78%	57.18%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	38.29%●	-18.40%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CAMT or HUBS?: It depends on your goal. value: HUBS (lower P/E); growth: HUBS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CAMT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, HUBS leads 8 to 5.
Is CAMT or HUBS cheaper?: On trailing earnings, HUBS is cheaper: CAMT trades at a 227.38 P/E and HUBS at 98.51.
Which has grown faster, CAMT or HUBS?: Over the past five years, HUBS grew revenue faster — CAMT at a 22.22% CAGR versus HUBS at 27.85%.
Is CAMT or HUBS more profitable?: CAMT runs the higher net margin — CAMT at 9.63% versus HUBS at 3.04%.
Which has been the better investment, CAMT or HUBS?: Over the past 10-year, CAMT delivered the higher annualized total return — CAMT at 58.63% versus HUBS at 14.37%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CAMT analysis Full HUBS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Camtek P/E ratio HubSpot P/E ratio Camtek dividend yield HubSpot dividend yield Camtek ROE HubSpot ROE Camtek operating margin HubSpot operating margin Camtek revenue growth HubSpot revenue growth Camtek free cash flow HubSpot free cash flow

Camtek & HubSpot appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.