Which has the lower trailing P/E, CAMT or EPAM?

EPAM has the lower trailing P/E: CAMT trades at 242.57 and EPAM at 15.98. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CAMT or EPAM?

Over the past five years, CAMT grew revenue faster — CAMT at a 18.98% CAGR versus EPAM at 13.08%.

Is CAMT or EPAM more profitable?

CAMT runs the higher net margin — CAMT at 7.40% versus EPAM at 7.15%.

How have CAMT and EPAM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CAMT delivered 51.13% and EPAM delivered 5.34% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Camtek Ltd. (CAMT) vs EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM)

A side-by-side comparison of Camtek Ltd. and EPAM Systems, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CAMT

Camtek Ltd.

$6.90B

$147.97TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

EPAM

EPAM Systems, Inc.

$6.16B

$117.91TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CAMT vs EPAM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CAMT +6043.7% (+51.0%/yr)EPAM +70.5% (+5.5%/yr)CAMT compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CAMT EPAM

CAMT vs EPAM: by the numbers

•CAMT is the larger company ($6.90B vs $6.16B market cap).
•EPAM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (15.98 vs 242.57 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CAMT converts more revenue to profit (7.40% vs 7.15% net margin).
•CAMT grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.98% vs 13.08% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CAMT	EPAM
P/E ratio	242.57	15.98
Forward P/E	N/A	8.97
P/S ratio	13.56	1.10
P/B ratio	9.72	1.75
EV / EBITDA	N/A	7.75
FCF yield	N/A	7.83%

Profitability

Metric	CAMT	EPAM
Gross margin	50.05%	28.33%
Operating margin	23.19%	10.26%
Net margin	7.40%	7.15%
ROE	5.30%	11.42%
ROIC	7.81%	11.07%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CAMT	EPAM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	18.98%	13.08%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	15.08%	2.86%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	40.44%	6.36%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	28.90%	-28.83%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CAMT or EPAM?: EPAM has the lower trailing P/E: CAMT trades at 242.57 and EPAM at 15.98. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CAMT or EPAM?: Over the past five years, CAMT grew revenue faster — CAMT at a 18.98% CAGR versus EPAM at 13.08%.
Is CAMT or EPAM more profitable?: CAMT runs the higher net margin — CAMT at 7.40% versus EPAM at 7.15%.
How have CAMT and EPAM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CAMT delivered 51.13% and EPAM delivered 5.34% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CAMT analysis Full EPAM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Camtek P/E ratio EPAM Systems P/E ratio Camtek ROE EPAM Systems ROE Camtek operating margin EPAM Systems operating margin Camtek revenue growth EPAM Systems revenue growth Camtek free cash flow EPAM Systems free cash flow

Camtek & EPAM Systems appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.