Which has the lower trailing P/E, CAMT or CRUS?

CRUS has the lower trailing P/E: CAMT trades at 236.48 and CRUS at 14.26. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CAMT or CRUS?

Over the past five years, CAMT grew revenue faster — CAMT at a 18.98% CAGR versus CRUS at 7.86%.

Is CAMT or CRUS more profitable?

CRUS runs the higher net margin — CAMT at 7.40% versus CRUS at 21.00%.

How have CAMT and CRUS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CAMT delivered 51.13% and CRUS delivered 9.17% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Camtek Ltd. (CAMT) vs Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS)

A side-by-side comparison of Camtek Ltd. and Cirrus Logic, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CAMT

Camtek Ltd.

$6.73B

$144.25TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 10, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

CRUS

Cirrus Logic, Inc.

$5.88B

$116.48TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 10, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CAMT vs CRUS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CAMT +5656.9% (+50.0%/yr)CRUS +126.0% (+8.5%/yr)CAMT compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CAMT CRUS

CAMT vs CRUS: by the numbers

•CAMT is the larger company ($6.73B vs $5.88B market cap).
•CRUS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.26 vs 236.48 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CRUS converts more revenue to profit (21.00% vs 7.40% net margin).
•CAMT grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.98% vs 7.86% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CAMT	CRUS
P/E ratio	236.48	14.26
Forward P/E	N/A	13.82
P/S ratio	13.22	2.87
P/B ratio	9.48	2.68
EV / EBITDA	N/A	9.98
FCF yield	N/A	9.74%

Profitability

Metric	CAMT	CRUS
Gross margin	50.05%	52.78%
Operating margin	23.19%	23.05%
Net margin	7.40%	21.00%
ROE	5.30%	19.67%
ROIC	7.81%	16.69%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CAMT	CRUS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	18.98%	7.86%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	15.08%	16.75%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	40.44%	14.36%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	28.90%	6.11%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CAMT or CRUS?: CRUS has the lower trailing P/E: CAMT trades at 236.48 and CRUS at 14.26. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CAMT or CRUS?: Over the past five years, CAMT grew revenue faster — CAMT at a 18.98% CAGR versus CRUS at 7.86%.
Is CAMT or CRUS more profitable?: CRUS runs the higher net margin — CAMT at 7.40% versus CRUS at 21.00%.
How have CAMT and CRUS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CAMT delivered 51.13% and CRUS delivered 9.17% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CAMT analysis Full CRUS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Camtek P/E ratio Cirrus Logic P/E ratio Camtek ROE Cirrus Logic ROE Camtek operating margin Cirrus Logic operating margin Camtek revenue growth Cirrus Logic revenue growth Camtek free cash flow Cirrus Logic free cash flow

Camtek & Cirrus Logic appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.