Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) vs Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN)
CAH and REGN are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.
A side-by-side comparison of Cardinal Health, Inc. and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CAH
Cardinal Health, Inc.
$223.85Healthcare
REGN
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
$612.14Healthcare
Total return — CAH vs REGN
growth of $100 · last 30yCAH +910.6%REGN +3554.6%REGN compounded faster
CAH REGN
CAH vs REGN: by the numbers
- •REGN is the larger company ($63.06B vs $52.43B market cap).
- •REGN trades at the lower earnings multiple (14.92 vs 34.23 P/E).
- •REGN converts more revenue to profit (29.65% vs 0.62% net margin).
- •REGN grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.16% vs 9.86% CAGR).
- •CAH pays the higher dividend yield (0.91% vs 0.59%).
Which is better, CAH or REGN?
Metric tally: CAH 8 · REGN 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueREGN(lower P/E)
GrowthREGN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCAH(higher dividend yield)
QualityCAH(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CAH | REGN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 34.23 | 14.92● |
| Forward P/E | 18.64 | 11.30● |
| P/S ratio | 0.21● | 4.42 |
| P/B ratio | — | 2.10 |
| PEG ratio | 0.30● | 3.38 |
| EV / EBITDA | 19.10 | 11.43● |
| FCF yield | 8.31%● | 6.30% |
Profitability
| Metric | CAH | REGN |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 3.68% | 84.55%● |
| Operating margin | 0.92% | 24.32%● |
| Net margin | 0.62% | 29.65%● |
| ROE | -56.13% | 14.08%● |
| ROIC | 11.37%● | 8.51% |
Dividends
| Metric | CAH | REGN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.91%● | 0.59% |
| Payout ratio | 31.52% | 8.45% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CAH | REGN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.86% | 10.16%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 6.11%● | 5.70% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 22.47%● | 15.42% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 33.46%● | 3.26% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CAH or REGN?
- It depends on your goal. value: REGN (lower P/E); growth: REGN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CAH (higher dividend yield); quality: CAH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is CAH or REGN cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, REGN is cheaper: CAH trades at a 34.23 P/E and REGN at 14.92.
- Which has grown faster, CAH or REGN?
- Over the past five years, REGN grew revenue faster — CAH at a 9.86% CAGR versus REGN at 10.16%.
- Does CAH or REGN pay a bigger dividend?
- CAH yields 0.91% and REGN yields 0.59% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CAH or REGN more profitable?
- REGN runs the higher net margin — CAH at 0.62% versus REGN at 29.65%.
- Which has been the better investment, CAH or REGN?
- Over the past 10-year, CAH delivered the higher annualized total return — CAH at 14.21% versus REGN at 5.19%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Cardinal Health P/E ratioRegeneron Pharmaceuticals P/E ratioCardinal Health dividend yieldRegeneron Pharmaceuticals dividend yieldCardinal Health ROERegeneron Pharmaceuticals ROECardinal Health operating marginRegeneron Pharmaceuticals operating marginCardinal Health revenue growthRegeneron Pharmaceuticals revenue growthCardinal Health free cash flowRegeneron Pharmaceuticals free cash flow
Cardinal Health & Regeneron Pharmaceuticals appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.