Which has grown faster, CAH or NTRA?

Over the past five years, NTRA grew revenue faster — CAH at a 9.37% CAGR versus NTRA at 39.92%.

Does CAH or NTRA pay a bigger dividend?

CAH pays a dividend (0.90% yield), while NTRA has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is CAH or NTRA more profitable?

CAH runs the higher net margin — CAH at 0.67% versus NTRA at -7.11%.

How have CAH and NTRA total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CAH delivered 14.48% and NTRA delivered 43.39% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) vs Natera, Inc. (NTRA)

A side-by-side comparison of Cardinal Health, Inc. and Natera, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CAH

Cardinal Health, Inc.

$53.47B

$228.30HealthcareDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

NTRA

Natera, Inc.

$58.77B

$410.35HealthcareDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CAH vs NTRA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CAH +282.4% (+14.4%/yr)NTRA +3613.4% (+43.5%/yr)NTRA compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CAH NTRA

CAH vs NTRA: by the numbers

•NTRA is the larger company ($58.77B vs $53.47B market cap).
•CAH is profitable (0.67% net margin) while NTRA runs a net loss (-7.11%).
•NTRA grew revenue faster over the past five years (39.92% vs 9.37% CAGR).
•CAH pays a dividend (0.90% yield), while NTRA has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CAH	NTRA
P/E ratio	31.58	N/A
Forward P/E	18.20	N/A
PEG ratio	1.12	N/A
P/S ratio	0.21	21.71
P/B ratio	N/A	32.26
EV / EBITDA	16.41	N/A
FCF yield	8.46%	0.12%

Profitability

Metric	CAH	NTRA
Gross margin	3.84%	65.30%
Operating margin	1.03%	-10.70%
Net margin	0.67%	-7.11%
ROE	N/A	-10.56%
ROIC	13.45%	-13.26%

Dividends

Metric	CAH	NTRA
Dividend yield	0.90%	N/A
Payout ratio	28.33%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CAH	NTRA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.37%	39.92%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	28.32%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	17.40%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	38.25%	29.45%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, CAH or NTRA?: Over the past five years, NTRA grew revenue faster — CAH at a 9.37% CAGR versus NTRA at 39.92%.
Does CAH or NTRA pay a bigger dividend?: CAH pays a dividend (0.90% yield), while NTRA has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CAH or NTRA more profitable?: CAH runs the higher net margin — CAH at 0.67% versus NTRA at -7.11%.
How have CAH and NTRA total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CAH delivered 14.48% and NTRA delivered 43.39% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CAH analysis Full NTRA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cardinal Health P/E ratio Cardinal Health dividend yield Cardinal Health ROE Natera ROE Cardinal Health operating margin Natera operating margin Cardinal Health revenue growth Natera revenue growth Cardinal Health free cash flow Natera free cash flow

Cardinal Health & Natera appear in these rankings

25+ Year Dividend Growers Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 2, 2026.