Is CAH or IQV cheaper?

On trailing earnings, IQV is cheaper: CAH trades at a 36.26 P/E and IQV at 25.25.

Which has grown faster, CAH or IQV?

Over the past five years, CAH grew revenue faster — CAH at a 9.86% CAGR versus IQV at 6.72%.

Does CAH or IQV pay a bigger dividend?

CAH pays a dividend (0.87% yield) while IQV does not currently pay one.

Is CAH or IQV more profitable?

IQV runs the higher net margin — CAH at 0.62% versus IQV at 8.33%.

Which has been the better investment, CAH or IQV?

Over the past 10-year, CAH delivered the higher annualized total return — CAH at 14.57% versus IQV at 11.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) vs IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV)

IQV leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Cardinal Health, Inc. and IQVIA Holdings Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

CAH

Cardinal Health, Inc.

Total return — CAH vs IQV

growth of $100 · last 13y

CAH +411.4%IQV +383.9%CAH compounded faster

CAH IQV

CAH vs IQV: by the numbers

•CAH is the larger company ($54.75B vs $34.88B market cap).
•IQV trades at the lower earnings multiple (25.25 vs 36.26 P/E).
•IQV converts more revenue to profit (8.33% vs 0.62% net margin).
•CAH grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.86% vs 6.72% CAGR).
•CAH pays a dividend (0.87% yield) while IQV does not currently pay one.

Which is better, CAH or IQV?

Metric tally: CAH 7 · IQV 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueIQV(lower P/E)

GrowthCAH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityCAH(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CAH	IQV
P/E ratio	36.26	25.25●
Forward P/E	22.02	15.90●
P/S ratio	0.22●	2.08
P/B ratio	—	5.56
PEG ratio	0.30●	6.34
EV / EBITDA	19.24	14.03●
FCF yield	7.85%●	7.35%

Profitability

Metric	CAH	IQV
Gross margin	3.68%	26.11%●
Operating margin	0.92%	13.86%●
Net margin	0.62%	8.33%●
ROE	-56.13%	22.26%●
ROIC	11.37%●	8.23%

Dividends

Metric	CAH	IQV
Dividend yield	0.87%	—
Payout ratio	31.84%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CAH	IQV
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.86%●	6.72%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	6.11%	40.21%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	22.47%●	4.53%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	36.12%●	-3.91%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CAH or IQV?: It depends on your goal. value: IQV (lower P/E); growth: CAH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CAH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, IQV leads 8 to 7.
Is CAH or IQV cheaper?: On trailing earnings, IQV is cheaper: CAH trades at a 36.26 P/E and IQV at 25.25.
Which has grown faster, CAH or IQV?: Over the past five years, CAH grew revenue faster — CAH at a 9.86% CAGR versus IQV at 6.72%.
Does CAH or IQV pay a bigger dividend?: CAH pays a dividend (0.87% yield) while IQV does not currently pay one.
Is CAH or IQV more profitable?: IQV runs the higher net margin — CAH at 0.62% versus IQV at 8.33%.
Which has been the better investment, CAH or IQV?: Over the past 10-year, CAH delivered the higher annualized total return — CAH at 14.57% versus IQV at 11.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CAH analysis Full IQV analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cardinal Health P/E ratio IQVIA P/E ratio Cardinal Health dividend yield IQVIA dividend yield Cardinal Health ROE IQVIA ROE Cardinal Health operating margin IQVIA operating margin Cardinal Health revenue growth IQVIA revenue growth Cardinal Health free cash flow IQVIA free cash flow

Cardinal Health & IQVIA appear in these rankings

Dividend Aristocrats Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.