Cardinal Health, Inc. (CAH) vs Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW)
CAH leads on 9 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Cardinal Health, Inc. and Edwards Lifesciences Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CAH
Cardinal Health, Inc.
$237.92Healthcare
EW
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
$90.78Healthcare
Total return — CAH vs EW
growth of $100 · last 26yCAH +620.1%EW +6502.2%EW compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CAH EW
CAH vs EW: by the numbers
- •CAH is the larger company ($55.72B vs $52.27B market cap).
- •CAH trades at the lower earnings multiple (36.38 vs 48.29 P/E).
- •EW converts more revenue to profit (17.34% vs 0.62% net margin).
- •CAH grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.86% vs 7.10% CAGR).
- •CAH pays a dividend (0.87% yield) while EW does not currently pay one.
Which is better, CAH or EW?
Metric tally: CAH 9 · EW 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCAH(lower P/E)
GrowthCAH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CAH | EW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 36.38● | 48.29 |
| Forward P/E | 19.82● | 26.89 |
| P/S ratio | 0.22● | 8.36 |
| P/B ratio | — | 5.10 |
| PEG ratio | 0.30● | 7.03 |
| EV / EBITDA | 19.30● | 26.80 |
| FCF yield | 7.82%● | 2.07% |
Profitability
| Metric | CAH | EW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 3.68% | 78.01%● |
| Operating margin | 0.92% | 27.62%● |
| Net margin | 0.62% | 17.34%● |
| ROE | -56.13% | 10.58%● |
| ROIC | 11.37% | 11.40% |
Dividends
| Metric | CAH | EW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.87% | — |
| Payout ratio | 31.84% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CAH | EW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.86%● | 7.10% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 6.11% | 6.87%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 22.47%● | 8.74% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 36.05%● | -2.60% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CAH or EW?
- It depends on your goal. value: CAH (lower P/E); growth: CAH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR). Across all compared metrics, CAH leads 9 to 5.
- Is CAH or EW cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CAH is cheaper: CAH trades at a 36.38 P/E and EW at 48.29.
- Which has grown faster, CAH or EW?
- Over the past five years, CAH grew revenue faster — CAH at a 9.86% CAGR versus EW at 7.10%.
- Does CAH or EW pay a bigger dividend?
- CAH pays a dividend (0.87% yield) while EW does not currently pay one.
- Is CAH or EW more profitable?
- EW runs the higher net margin — CAH at 0.62% versus EW at 17.34%.
- Which has been the better investment, CAH or EW?
- Over the past 10-year, CAH delivered the higher annualized total return — CAH at 15.40% versus EW at 10.98%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Cardinal Health P/E ratioEdwards Lifesciences P/E ratioCardinal Health dividend yieldEdwards Lifesciences dividend yieldCardinal Health ROEEdwards Lifesciences ROECardinal Health operating marginEdwards Lifesciences operating marginCardinal Health revenue growthEdwards Lifesciences revenue growthCardinal Health free cash flowEdwards Lifesciences free cash flow
Cardinal Health & Edwards Lifesciences appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.