Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) vs Smithfield Foods, Inc. (SFD)
CAG leads on 7 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Conagra Brands, Inc. and Smithfield Foods, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CAG
Conagra Brands, Inc.
$14.48Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 16, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT
SFD
Smithfield Foods, Inc.
$25.62Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 16, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CAG vs SFD
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 1yCAG -36.9%SFD +33.9%SFD compounded faster
CAG SFD
CAG vs SFD: by the numbers
- •SFD is the larger company ($10.08B vs $6.93B market cap).
- •SFD is profitable (6.48% net margin) while CAG runs a net loss (-16.99%).
- •SFD grew revenue faster over the past five years (0.92% vs -0.55% CAGR).
- •CAG pays the higher dividend yield (9.94% vs 4.39%).
Which is better, CAG or SFD?
Metric tally: CAG 7 · SFD 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthSFD(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCAG(higher dividend yield)
QualitySFD(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CAG | SFD |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | — | 10.01 |
| Forward P/E | 8.31● | 9.67 |
| P/S ratio | 0.60● | 0.65 |
| P/B ratio | 1.06● | 1.47 |
| PEG ratio | — | 2.42 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.53 | 6.64● |
| FCF yield | 12.48%● | 8.05% |
Profitability
| Metric | CAG | SFD |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 23.92%● | 13.44% |
| Operating margin | -14.43% | 8.62%● |
| Net margin | -16.99% | 6.48%● |
| ROE | -30.14% | 14.69%● |
| ROIC | -10.93% | 9.58%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CAG | SFD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 9.94%● | 4.39% |
| Payout ratio | — | 44.82% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CAG | SFD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -0.55% | 0.92%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | — | 7.75% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 8.23%● | 5.08% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -11.70% | — |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CAG or SFD?
- It depends on your goal. growth: SFD (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CAG (higher dividend yield); quality: SFD (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CAG leads 7 to 6.
- Which has grown faster, CAG or SFD?
- Over the past five years, SFD grew revenue faster — CAG at a -0.55% CAGR versus SFD at 0.92%.
- Does CAG or SFD pay a bigger dividend?
- CAG yields 9.94% and SFD yields 4.39% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CAG or SFD more profitable?
- SFD runs the higher net margin — CAG at -16.99% versus SFD at 6.48%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Conagra Brands P/E ratioSmithfield Foods P/E ratioConagra Brands dividend yieldSmithfield Foods dividend yieldConagra Brands ROESmithfield Foods ROEConagra Brands operating marginSmithfield Foods operating marginConagra Brands revenue growthSmithfield Foods revenue growthConagra Brands free cash flowSmithfield Foods free cash flow
Conagra Brands & Smithfield Foods appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 16, 2026.