Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) vs McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC)
MKC leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Conagra Brands, Inc. and McCormick & Company, Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CAG
Conagra Brands, Inc.
$13.74Consumer Defensive
MKC
McCormick & Company, Incorporated
$48.95Consumer Defensive
Total return — CAG vs MKC
growth of $100 · last 30yCAG -18.4%MKC +790.0%MKC compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CAG MKC
CAG vs MKC: by the numbers
- •MKC is the larger company ($13.16B vs $6.57B market cap).
- •MKC is profitable (23.12% net margin) while CAG runs a net loss (-0.39%).
- •MKC grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.90% vs -0.56% CAGR).
- •CAG pays the higher dividend yield (10.19% vs 3.80%).
Which is better, CAG or MKC?
Metric tally: CAG 6 · MKC 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthMKC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCAG(higher dividend yield)
QualityMKC(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | CAG | MKC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | — | 8.02 |
| Forward P/E | 8.64● | 14.76 |
| P/S ratio | 0.59● | 1.86 |
| P/B ratio | 0.81● | 1.89 |
| PEG ratio | — | 8.19 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.96 | 13.96 |
| FCF yield | 12.80%● | 6.21% |
Profitability
| Metric | CAG | MKC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 24.18% | 37.94%● |
| Operating margin | 12.28% | 15.51%● |
| Net margin | -0.39% | 23.12%● |
| ROE | -0.53% | 23.54%● |
| ROIC | 7.37% | 7.93%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CAG | MKC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 10.19%● | 3.80% |
| Payout ratio | 58.09% | 63.27% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CAG | MKC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -0.56% | 3.90%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.89%● | 0.98% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -10.32% | 2.35%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -13.87% | -9.28%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CAG or MKC?
- It depends on your goal. growth: MKC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CAG (higher dividend yield); quality: MKC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MKC leads 8 to 6.
- Which has grown faster, CAG or MKC?
- Over the past five years, MKC grew revenue faster — CAG at a -0.56% CAGR versus MKC at 3.90%.
- Does CAG or MKC pay a bigger dividend?
- CAG yields 10.19% and MKC yields 3.80% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CAG or MKC more profitable?
- MKC runs the higher net margin — CAG at -0.39% versus MKC at 23.12%.
- Which has been the better investment, CAG or MKC?
- Over the past 10-year, MKC delivered the higher annualized total return — CAG at -5.73% versus MKC at 1.73%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Conagra Brands P/E ratioMcCormick & P/E ratioConagra Brands dividend yieldMcCormick & dividend yieldConagra Brands ROEMcCormick & ROEConagra Brands operating marginMcCormick & operating marginConagra Brands revenue growthMcCormick & revenue growthConagra Brands free cash flowMcCormick & free cash flow
Conagra Brands & McCormick & appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.