Carlsberg A/S (CABGY) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)
A side-by-side comparison of Carlsberg A/S and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CABGY
Carlsberg A/S
$25.89Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$115.91Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT
Total return — CABGY vs STZ
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCABGY +79.0% (+6.0%/yr)STZ -22.2% (-2.5%/yr)CABGY compounded faster over this window
CABGY STZ
CABGY vs STZ: by the numbers
- •STZ is the larger company ($19.80B vs $17.11B market cap).
- •STZ trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.06 vs 17.22 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •STZ converts more revenue to profit (20.14% vs 6.68% net margin).
- •CABGY grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.83% vs 0.86% CAGR).
- •STZ pays the higher dividend yield (3.62% vs 3.42%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CABGY | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 17.22 | 11.06 |
| Forward P/E | N/A | 9.89 |
| PEG ratio | 82.01 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 1.21 | 2.19 |
| P/B ratio | 3.94 | 2.40 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.67 | 9.10 |
| FCF yield | 8.54% | 9.26% |
Profitability
| Metric | CABGY | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 45.16% | 52.62% |
| Operating margin | 14.16% | 32.14% |
| Net margin | 6.68% | 20.14% |
| ROE | 21.42% | 22.10% |
| ROIC | 8.63% | 10.85% |
Dividends
| Metric | CABGY | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.42% | 3.62% |
| Payout ratio | 59.00% | 39.12% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CABGY | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 7.83% | 0.86% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 0.13% | -1.59% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 2.74% | -1.73% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -2.00% | -10.20% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CABGY or STZ?
- STZ has the lower trailing P/E: CABGY trades at 17.22 and STZ at 11.06. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CABGY or STZ?
- Over the past five years, CABGY grew revenue faster — CABGY at a 7.83% CAGR versus STZ at 0.86%.
- Does CABGY or STZ pay a bigger dividend?
- CABGY yields 3.42% and STZ yields 3.62% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CABGY or STZ more profitable?
- STZ runs the higher net margin — CABGY at 6.68% versus STZ at 20.14%.
- How have CABGY and STZ total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CABGY delivered 5.82% and STZ delivered -2.33% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Carlsberg A/S P/E ratioConstellation Brands P/E ratioCarlsberg A/S dividend yieldConstellation Brands dividend yieldCarlsberg A/S ROEConstellation Brands ROECarlsberg A/S operating marginConstellation Brands operating marginCarlsberg A/S revenue growthConstellation Brands revenue growthCarlsberg A/S free cash flowConstellation Brands free cash flow
Carlsberg A/S & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.