China Automotive Systems, Inc. (CAAS) vs Vera Bradley, Inc. (VRA)

A side-by-side comparison of China Automotive Systems, Inc. and Vera Bradley, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — CAAS vs VRA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
CAAS +31.7% (+2.8%/yr)VRA -66.1% (-10.2%/yr)CAAS compounded faster over this window
050100150200Start $10020182020202220242026$132$34
CAAS VRA

CAAS vs VRA: by the numbers

  • •VRA is the larger company ($144M vs $140M market cap).
  • •CAAS is profitable (6.88% net margin) while VRA runs a net loss (-3.66%).
  • •CAAS grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.28% vs -12.10% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCAASVRA
P/S ratioN/A0.52
P/B ratio0.321.09
EV / EBITDAN/A9.69
FCF yield59.26%36.60%

Profitability

MetricCAASVRA
Gross margin20.94%50.43%
Operating margin9.73%-3.08%
Net margin6.88%-3.66%
ROE12.94%-7.58%
ROIC11.21%-4.51%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCAASVRA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)10.28%-12.10%
FCF CAGR (5Y)39.02%-26.39%
Total return CAGR (5Y)12.43%-12.00%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, CAAS or VRA?
Over the past five years, CAAS grew revenue faster — CAAS at a 10.28% CAGR versus VRA at -12.10%.
Is CAAS or VRA more profitable?
CAAS runs the higher net margin — CAAS at 6.88% versus VRA at -3.66%.
How have CAAS and VRA total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, CAAS delivered 2.50% and VRA delivered -10.52% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.