BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK)
SWK leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of BWX Technologies, Inc. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BWXT
BWX Technologies, Inc.
$169.56IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
SWK
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
$87.50IndustrialsAt close: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — BWXT vs SWK
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 16yBWXT +1279.5%SWK +163.0%BWXT compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
BWXT SWK
BWXT vs SWK: by the numbers
- •BWXT is the larger company ($15.53B vs $13.60B market cap).
- •SWK trades at the lower earnings multiple (35.86 vs 45.10 P/E).
- •BWXT converts more revenue to profit (10.21% vs 2.44% net margin).
- •BWXT grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.87% vs -0.19% CAGR).
- •SWK pays the higher dividend yield (3.79% vs 0.61%).
Which is better, BWXT or SWK?
Metric tally: BWXT 8 · SWK 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSWK(lower P/E)
GrowthBWXT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSWK(higher dividend yield)
QualityBWXT(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BWXT | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 45.10 | 35.86● |
| Forward P/E | 36.07 | 19.25● |
| P/S ratio | 4.61 | 0.88● |
| P/B ratio | 12.17 | 1.49● |
| PEG ratio | 2.84 | 0.82● |
| EV / EBITDA | 36.65 | 11.78● |
| FCF yield | 2.11% | 5.44%● |
Profitability
| Metric | BWXT | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 22.63% | 30.03%● |
| Operating margin | 10.42%● | 7.79% |
| Net margin | 10.21%● | 2.44% |
| ROE | 26.92%● | 4.13% |
| ROIC | 7.42%● | 6.41% |
Dividends
| Metric | BWXT | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.61% | 3.79%● |
| Payout ratio | 28.89% | 125.28% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BWXT | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.87%● | -0.19% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 4.28%● | -19.52% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 104.80%● | 47.72% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 25.33%● | -12.49% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BWXT or SWK?
- It depends on your goal. value: SWK (lower P/E); growth: BWXT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SWK (higher dividend yield); quality: BWXT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SWK leads 9 to 8.
- Is BWXT or SWK cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SWK is cheaper: BWXT trades at a 45.10 P/E and SWK at 35.86.
- Which has grown faster, BWXT or SWK?
- Over the past five years, BWXT grew revenue faster — BWXT at a 9.87% CAGR versus SWK at -0.19%.
- Does BWXT or SWK pay a bigger dividend?
- BWXT yields 0.61% and SWK yields 3.79% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BWXT or SWK more profitable?
- BWXT runs the higher net margin — BWXT at 10.21% versus SWK at 2.44%.
- Which has been the better investment, BWXT or SWK?
- Over the past 10-year, BWXT delivered the higher annualized total return — BWXT at 18.06% versus SWK at -0.21%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
BWX Technologies P/E ratioStanley Black & Decker P/E ratioBWX Technologies dividend yieldStanley Black & Decker dividend yieldBWX Technologies ROEStanley Black & Decker ROEBWX Technologies operating marginStanley Black & Decker operating marginBWX Technologies revenue growthStanley Black & Decker revenue growthBWX Technologies free cash flowStanley Black & Decker free cash flow
BWX Technologies & Stanley Black & Decker appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 20, 2026.