Betterware de Mexico, S.A.P.I. de C.V. (BWMX) vs Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT)
A side-by-side comparison of Betterware de Mexico, S.A.P.I. de C.V. and Liquidity Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
BWMX
Betterware de Mexico, S.A.P.I. de C.V.
$16.50Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
LQDT
Liquidity Services, Inc.
$43.23Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — BWMX vs LQDT
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8yBWMX +183.5% (+13.9%/yr)LQDT +587.2% (+27.2%/yr)LQDT compounded faster over this window
BWMX LQDT
BWMX vs LQDT: by the numbers
- •LQDT is the larger company ($1.35B vs $615M market cap).
- •BWMX trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (9.05 vs 42.38 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •BWMX converts more revenue to profit (8.47% vs 6.79% net margin).
- •LQDT grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.03% vs 10.40% CAGR).
- •BWMX pays a dividend (7.74% yield), while LQDT has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BWMX | LQDT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 9.05 | 42.38 |
| Forward P/E | N/A | 23.49 |
| PEG ratio | 0.31 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 0.74 | 2.75 |
| P/B ratio | 4.73 | 5.72 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.54 | 20.89 |
| FCF yield | 76.82% | 6.68% |
Profitability
| Metric | BWMX | LQDT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 66.13% | 46.56% |
| Operating margin | 16.43% | 9.00% |
| Net margin | 8.47% | 6.79% |
| ROE | 54.02% | 14.10% |
| ROIC | N/A | 11.85% |
Dividends
| Metric | BWMX | LQDT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 7.74% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 69.63% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BWMX | LQDT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 10.40% | 15.03% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 29.12% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 52.04% | 9.39% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -6.26% | 15.02% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, BWMX or LQDT?
- BWMX has the lower trailing P/E: BWMX trades at 9.05 and LQDT at 42.38. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, BWMX or LQDT?
- Over the past five years, LQDT grew revenue faster — BWMX at a 10.40% CAGR versus LQDT at 15.03%.
- Does BWMX or LQDT pay a bigger dividend?
- BWMX pays a dividend (7.74% yield), while LQDT has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is BWMX or LQDT more profitable?
- BWMX runs the higher net margin — BWMX at 8.47% versus LQDT at 6.79%.
- How have BWMX and LQDT total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, BWMX delivered -6.26% and LQDT delivered 15.02% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Betterware de Mexico, S.A.P.I. de C.V. P/E ratioLiquidity Services P/E ratioBetterware de Mexico, S.A.P.I. de C.V. dividend yieldBetterware de Mexico, S.A.P.I. de C.V. ROELiquidity Services ROEBetterware de Mexico, S.A.P.I. de C.V. operating marginLiquidity Services operating marginBetterware de Mexico, S.A.P.I. de C.V. revenue growthLiquidity Services revenue growthBetterware de Mexico, S.A.P.I. de C.V. free cash flowLiquidity Services free cash flow
Betterware de Mexico, S.A.P.I. de C.V. & Liquidity Services appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 2, 2026.