Which has the lower trailing P/E, BWMN or PAYS?

PAYS has the lower trailing P/E: BWMN trades at 104.33 and PAYS at 56.31. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, BWMN or PAYS?

Over the past five years, PAYS grew revenue faster — BWMN at a 32.34% CAGR versus PAYS at 38.11%.

Is BWMN or PAYS more profitable?

PAYS runs the higher net margin — BWMN at 1.34% versus PAYS at 15.67%.

How have BWMN and PAYS total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, BWMN delivered 26.18% and PAYS delivered 42.06% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) vs Paysign, Inc. (PAYS)

A side-by-side comparison of Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. and Paysign, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

BWMN

Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.

$749M

$42.78IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 1:54 PM EDT

PAYS

Paysign, Inc.

$812M

$14.53IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 1:55 PM EDT

Total return — BWMN vs PAYS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5y

BWMN +205.4% (+25.0%/yr)PAYS +305.8% (+32.3%/yr)PAYS compounded faster over this window

BWMN PAYS

BWMN vs PAYS: by the numbers

•PAYS is the larger company ($812M vs $749M market cap).
•PAYS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (56.31 vs 104.33 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PAYS converts more revenue to profit (15.67% vs 1.34% net margin).
•PAYS grew revenue faster over the past five years (38.11% vs 32.34% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BWMN	PAYS
P/E ratio	104.33	56.31
Forward P/E	N/A	42.11
PEG ratio	2.05	N/A
P/S ratio	1.42	8.07
P/B ratio	2.92	13.50
EV / EBITDA	19.92	29.92
FCF yield	1.59%	7.94%

Profitability

Metric	BWMN	PAYS
Gross margin	46.54%	56.18%
Operating margin	3.91%	8.83%
Net margin	1.34%	15.67%
ROE	2.76%	26.22%
ROIC	3.99%	19.58%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BWMN	PAYS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	32.34%	38.11%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	51.32%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	77.03%	20.20%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	26.18%	42.06%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, BWMN or PAYS?: PAYS has the lower trailing P/E: BWMN trades at 104.33 and PAYS at 56.31. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, BWMN or PAYS?: Over the past five years, PAYS grew revenue faster — BWMN at a 32.34% CAGR versus PAYS at 38.11%.
Is BWMN or PAYS more profitable?: PAYS runs the higher net margin — BWMN at 1.34% versus PAYS at 15.67%.
How have BWMN and PAYS total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, BWMN delivered 26.18% and PAYS delivered 42.06% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BWMN analysis Full PAYS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Bowman Consulting P/E ratio Paysign P/E ratio Bowman Consulting ROE Paysign ROE Bowman Consulting operating margin Paysign operating margin Bowman Consulting revenue growth Paysign revenue growth Bowman Consulting free cash flow Paysign free cash flow

Bowman Consulting & Paysign appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.