Which has the lower trailing P/E, BWMN or KE?

KE has the lower trailing P/E: BWMN trades at 104.35 and KE at 25.26. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, BWMN or KE?

Over the past five years, BWMN grew revenue faster — BWMN at a 32.34% CAGR versus KE at 2.07%.

Is BWMN or KE more profitable?

KE runs the higher net margin — BWMN at 1.34% versus KE at 1.95%.

How have BWMN and KE total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, BWMN delivered 26.18% and KE delivered 0.73% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) vs Kimball Electronics, Inc. (KE)

A side-by-side comparison of Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. and Kimball Electronics, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

BWMN

Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.

$749M

$42.78IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 10:39 AM EDT

Kimball Electronics, Inc.

$686M

$28.54IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 10:39 AM EDT

Total return — BWMN vs KE

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5y

BWMN +205.4% (+25.0%/yr)KE +25.8% (+4.7%/yr)BWMN compounded faster over this window

BWMN KE

BWMN vs KE: by the numbers

•BWMN is the larger company ($749M vs $686M market cap).
•KE trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (25.26 vs 104.35 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•KE converts more revenue to profit (1.95% vs 1.34% net margin).
•BWMN grew revenue faster over the past five years (32.34% vs 2.07% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BWMN	KE
P/E ratio	104.35	25.26
Forward P/E	N/A	17.83
PEG ratio	2.05	N/A
P/S ratio	1.42	0.48
P/B ratio	2.92	1.17
EV / EBITDA	19.93	6.77
FCF yield	1.59%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	BWMN	KE
Gross margin	46.54%	8.10%
Operating margin	3.91%	4.83%
Net margin	1.34%	1.95%
ROE	2.76%	4.78%
ROIC	3.99%	4.93%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BWMN	KE
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	32.34%	2.07%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	51.32%	-12.95%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	77.03%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	26.18%	0.73%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, BWMN or KE?: KE has the lower trailing P/E: BWMN trades at 104.35 and KE at 25.26. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, BWMN or KE?: Over the past five years, BWMN grew revenue faster — BWMN at a 32.34% CAGR versus KE at 2.07%.
Is BWMN or KE more profitable?: KE runs the higher net margin — BWMN at 1.34% versus KE at 1.95%.
How have BWMN and KE total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, BWMN delivered 26.18% and KE delivered 0.73% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BWMN analysis Full KE analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Bowman Consulting P/E ratio Kimball Electronics P/E ratio Bowman Consulting ROE Kimball Electronics ROE Bowman Consulting operating margin Kimball Electronics operating margin Bowman Consulting revenue growth Kimball Electronics revenue growth Bowman Consulting free cash flow Kimball Electronics free cash flow

Bowman Consulting & Kimball Electronics appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.