Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) vs Cass Information Systems, Inc. (CASS)

A side-by-side comparison of Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. and Cass Information Systems, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — BWMN vs CASS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5y
BWMN +205.4% (+25.0%/yr)CASS +36.2% (+6.4%/yr)BWMN compounded faster over this window
100200300Start $10020222023202420252026$305$136
BWMN CASS

BWMN vs CASS: by the numbers

  • •BWMN is the larger company ($749M vs $697M market cap).
  • •CASS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (19.48 vs 104.29 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • •CASS converts more revenue to profit (18.08% vs 1.34% net margin).
  • •BWMN grew revenue faster over the past five years (32.34% vs 6.42% CAGR).
  • •CASS pays a dividend (2.36% yield), while BWMN has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricBWMNCASS
P/E ratio104.2919.48
Forward P/EN/A18.14
PEG ratio2.052.27
P/S ratio1.423.43
P/B ratio2.922.85
EV / EBITDA19.9210.67
FCF yield1.59%6.01%

Profitability

MetricBWMNCASS
Gross margin46.54%96.24%
Operating margin3.91%22.48%
Net margin1.34%18.08%
ROE2.76%15.01%
ROIC3.99%1.41%

Dividends

MetricBWMNCASS
Dividend yieldN/A2.36%
Payout ratioN/A46.04%

Growth (annualized)

MetricBWMNCASS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)32.34%6.42%
EPS CAGR (5Y)51.32%8.74%
FCF CAGR (5Y)77.03%-7.04%
Total return CAGR (5Y)26.18%8.36%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, BWMN or CASS?
CASS has the lower trailing P/E: BWMN trades at 104.29 and CASS at 19.48. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, BWMN or CASS?
Over the past five years, BWMN grew revenue faster — BWMN at a 32.34% CAGR versus CASS at 6.42%.
Does BWMN or CASS pay a bigger dividend?
CASS pays a dividend (2.36% yield), while BWMN has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is BWMN or CASS more profitable?
CASS runs the higher net margin — BWMN at 1.34% versus CASS at 18.08%.
How have BWMN and CASS total returns compared?
Over the past 5 years, BWMN delivered 26.18% and CASS delivered 8.36% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.