Bioventus Inc. (BVS) vs Cullinan Therapeutics, Inc. (CGEM)

A side-by-side comparison of Bioventus Inc. and Cullinan Therapeutics, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — BVS vs CGEM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y
BVS -29.6% (-5.7%/yr)CGEM -58.2% (-13.5%/yr)BVS compounded faster over this window
050100Start $10020222023202420252026$70$42
BVS CGEM

BVS vs CGEM: by the numbers

  • •CGEM is the larger company ($1.06B vs $915M market cap).
  • •BVS is profitable (9.36% net margin) while CGEM runs a net loss (0.00%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricBVSCGEM
P/E ratio17.53N/A
Forward P/E17.33N/A
P/S ratio1.57N/A
P/B ratio4.013.29
EV / EBITDA10.73N/A
FCF yield10.31%N/A

Profitability

MetricBVSCGEM
Gross margin68.00%0.00%
Operating margin10.63%0.00%
Net margin9.36%0.00%
ROE23.86%-63.62%
ROIC11.37%-68.64%

Growth (annualized)

MetricBVSCGEM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)11.82%N/A
EPS CAGR (5Y)-5.03%N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)43.36%N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)-0.81%-7.48%

Frequently asked

Is BVS or CGEM more profitable?
BVS runs the higher net margin — BVS at 9.36% versus CGEM at 0.00%.
How have BVS and CGEM total returns compared?
Over the past 5 years, BVS delivered -0.81% and CGEM delivered -7.48% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.