Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) vs Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST)

A side-by-side comparison of Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV and Costco Wholesale Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 31, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total returnBUD vs COST

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 17y
BUD +222.7%COST +2391.6%COST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
101001k10kStart $10020122015201820212024$323$2,492
BUD COST

BUD vs COST: by the numbers

  • COST is the larger company ($422.14B vs $167.00B market cap).
  • BUD trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.15 vs 47.88 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • BUD converts more revenue to profit (10.14% vs 3.01% net margin).
  • COST grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.48% vs 3.94% CAGR).
  • BUD pays the higher dividend yield (1.56% vs 0.56%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricBUDCOST
P/E ratio14.1547.88
Forward P/E19.5946.34
P/S ratio1.421.44
P/B ratio1.9612.62
PEG ratio1.005.23
EV / EBITDA4.7729.90
FCF yield13.07%2.08%

Profitability

MetricBUDCOST
Gross margin55.67%12.88%
Operating margin31.82%3.82%
Net margin10.14%3.01%
ROE13.99%26.38%
ROIC6.32%19.44%

Dividends

MetricBUDCOST
Dividend yield1.56%0.56%
Payout ratio38.95%29.44%

Growth (annualized)

MetricBUDCOST
Revenue CAGR (5Y)3.94%9.48%
EPS CAGR (5Y)37.66%15.04%
FCF CAGR (5Y)10.48%4.95%
Total return CAGR (5Y)8.07%17.97%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, BUD or COST?
BUD has the lower trailing P/E: BUD trades at 14.15 and COST at 47.88. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, BUD or COST?
Over the past five years, COST grew revenue faster — BUD at a 3.94% CAGR versus COST at 9.48%.
Does BUD or COST pay a bigger dividend?
BUD yields 1.56% and COST yields 0.56% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is BUD or COST more profitable?
BUD runs the higher net margin — BUD at 10.14% versus COST at 3.01%.
How have BUD and COST total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, BUD delivered -1.98% and COST delivered 19.98% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 31, 2026.