British American Tobacco p.l.c. (BTI) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST)
A side-by-side comparison of British American Tobacco p.l.c. and Monster Beverage Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 21, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
BTI
British American Tobacco p.l.c.
$56.21Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$47.79Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — BTI vs MNST
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yBTI +72.3% (+5.6%/yr)MNST +262.8% (+13.8%/yr)MNST compounded faster over this window
BTI MNST
BTI vs MNST: by the numbers
- •BTI is the larger company ($121.24B vs $93.48B market cap).
- •BTI trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (9.59 vs 43.77 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.08% vs 20.62% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.36% vs -3.08% CAGR).
- •BTI pays a dividend (5.76% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BTI | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 9.59 | 43.77 |
| Forward P/E | 15.57 | 41.02 |
| P/S ratio | 1.80 | 10.18 |
| P/B ratio | 1.91 | 10.03 |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.77 | 31.72 |
| FCF yield | 15.70% | 2.23% |
Profitability
| Metric | BTI | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 83.50% | 55.55% |
| Operating margin | 39.04% | 29.16% |
| Net margin | 20.62% | 23.08% |
| ROE | 6.94% | 22.72% |
| ROIC | 8.04% | 21.32% |
Dividends
| Metric | BTI | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 5.76% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 68.53% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BTI | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -3.08% | 12.36% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 4.31% | 7.95% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -9.26% | 7.93% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 17.25% | 14.45% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, BTI or MNST?
- BTI has the lower trailing P/E: BTI trades at 9.59 and MNST at 43.77. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, BTI or MNST?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — BTI at a -3.08% CAGR versus MNST at 12.36%.
- Does BTI or MNST pay a bigger dividend?
- BTI pays a dividend (5.76% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is BTI or MNST more profitable?
- MNST runs the higher net margin — BTI at 20.62% versus MNST at 23.08%.
- How have BTI and MNST total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, BTI delivered 5.54% and MNST delivered 13.58% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
British American Tobacco p.l.c. P/E ratioMonster Beverage P/E ratioBritish American Tobacco p.l.c. dividend yieldBritish American Tobacco p.l.c. ROEMonster Beverage ROEBritish American Tobacco p.l.c. operating marginMonster Beverage operating marginBritish American Tobacco p.l.c. revenue growthMonster Beverage revenue growthBritish American Tobacco p.l.c. free cash flowMonster Beverage free cash flow
British American Tobacco p.l.c. & Monster Beverage appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 21, 2026.