Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) vs Natera, Inc. (NTRA)

A side-by-side comparison of Boston Scientific Corporation and Natera, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — BSX vs NTRA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
BSX +85.7% (+6.4%/yr)NTRA +3613.4% (+43.5%/yr)NTRA compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
101001k10kStart $10020182020202220242026$186$3,713
BSX NTRA

BSX vs NTRA: by the numbers

  • •BSX is the larger company ($63.32B vs $58.77B market cap).
  • •BSX is profitable (17.47% net margin) while NTRA runs a net loss (-7.11%).
  • •NTRA grew revenue faster over the past five years (39.92% vs 13.40% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricBSXNTRA
P/E ratio17.32N/A
Forward P/E13.03N/A
PEG ratio0.58N/A
P/S ratio3.0221.71
P/B ratio2.5432.26
EV / EBITDA13.01N/A
FCF yield5.72%0.12%

Profitability

MetricBSXNTRA
Gross margin71.16%65.30%
Operating margin21.46%-10.70%
Net margin17.47%-7.11%
ROE14.71%-10.56%
ROIC10.57%-13.26%

Growth (annualized)

MetricBSXNTRA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)13.40%39.92%
EPS CAGR (5Y)29.71%N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)15.64%N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)0.09%29.45%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, BSX or NTRA?
Over the past five years, NTRA grew revenue faster — BSX at a 13.40% CAGR versus NTRA at 39.92%.
Is BSX or NTRA more profitable?
BSX runs the higher net margin — BSX at 17.47% versus NTRA at -7.11%.
How have BSX and NTRA total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, BSX delivered 5.99% and NTRA delivered 43.39% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 2, 2026.