Is BSX or HUM cheaper?

On trailing earnings, BSX is cheaper: BSX trades at a 19.71 P/E and HUM at 40.67.

Which has grown faster, BSX or HUM?

Over the past five years, BSX grew revenue faster — BSX at a 15.29% CAGR versus HUM at 11.71%.

Does BSX or HUM pay a bigger dividend?

HUM pays a dividend (0.93% yield) while BSX does not currently pay one.

Is BSX or HUM more profitable?

BSX runs the higher net margin — BSX at 17.24% versus HUM at 0.82%.

Which has been the better investment, BSX or HUM?

Over the past 10-year, HUM delivered the higher annualized total return — BSX at 7.47% versus HUM at 8.11%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) vs Humana Inc. (HUM)

BSX leads on 13 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Boston Scientific Corporation and Humana Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

BSX

Boston Scientific Corporation

Total return — BSX vs HUM

growth of $100 · last 30y

BSX +372.2%HUM +1913.4%HUM compounded faster

BSX HUM

BSX vs HUM: by the numbers

•BSX is the larger company ($69.74B vs $45.03B market cap).
•BSX trades at the lower earnings multiple (19.71 vs 40.67 P/E).
•BSX converts more revenue to profit (17.24% vs 0.82% net margin).
•BSX grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.29% vs 11.71% CAGR).
•HUM pays a dividend (0.93% yield) while BSX does not currently pay one.

Which is better, BSX or HUM?

Metric tally: BSX 13 · HUM 2

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueBSX(lower P/E)

GrowthBSX(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityBSX(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BSX	HUM
P/E ratio	19.71●	40.67
Forward P/E	12.60●	24.00
P/S ratio	3.40	0.33●
P/B ratio	2.71	2.47●
PEG ratio	0.88	—
EV / EBITDA	14.07●	19.26
FCF yield	4.91%●	2.77%

Profitability

Metric	BSX	HUM
Gross margin	70.41%●	14.01%
Operating margin	20.12%●	1.01%
Net margin	17.24%●	0.82%
ROE	13.74%●	6.08%
ROIC	8.78%●	3.12%

Dividends

Metric	BSX	HUM
Dividend yield	—	0.93%
Payout ratio	—	35.87%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BSX	HUM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	15.29%●	11.71%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-8.67%●	-17.27%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	19.89%●	-17.19%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	1.86%●	-1.65%

Frequently asked

Which is better, BSX or HUM?: It depends on your goal. value: BSX (lower P/E); growth: BSX (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: BSX (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BSX leads 13 to 2.
Is BSX or HUM cheaper?: On trailing earnings, BSX is cheaper: BSX trades at a 19.71 P/E and HUM at 40.67.
Which has grown faster, BSX or HUM?: Over the past five years, BSX grew revenue faster — BSX at a 15.29% CAGR versus HUM at 11.71%.
Does BSX or HUM pay a bigger dividend?: HUM pays a dividend (0.93% yield) while BSX does not currently pay one.
Is BSX or HUM more profitable?: BSX runs the higher net margin — BSX at 17.24% versus HUM at 0.82%.
Which has been the better investment, BSX or HUM?: Over the past 10-year, HUM delivered the higher annualized total return — BSX at 7.47% versus HUM at 8.11%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BSX analysis Full HUM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Boston Scientific P/E ratio Humana P/E ratio Boston Scientific dividend yield Humana dividend yield Boston Scientific ROE Humana ROE Boston Scientific operating margin Humana operating margin Boston Scientific revenue growth Humana revenue growth Boston Scientific free cash flow Humana free cash flow

Boston Scientific & Humana appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 17, 2026.