Is BSX or CI cheaper?

On trailing earnings, CI is cheaper: BSX trades at a 19.71 P/E and CI at 12.46.

Which has grown faster, BSX or CI?

Over the past five years, BSX grew revenue faster — BSX at a 15.29% CAGR versus CI at 11.28%.

Does BSX or CI pay a bigger dividend?

CI pays a dividend (2.09% yield) while BSX does not currently pay one.

Is BSX or CI more profitable?

BSX runs the higher net margin — BSX at 17.24% versus CI at 2.26%.

Which has been the better investment, BSX or CI?

Over the past 10-year, CI delivered the higher annualized total return — BSX at 7.47% versus CI at 9.61%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) vs Cigna Corporation (CI)

CI leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Boston Scientific Corporation and Cigna Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

BSX

Boston Scientific Corporation

Total return — BSX vs CI

growth of $100 · last 30y

BSX +372.2%CI +2236.0%CI compounded faster

BSX CI

BSX vs CI: by the numbers

•CI is the larger company ($77.02B vs $69.74B market cap).
•CI trades at the lower earnings multiple (12.46 vs 19.71 P/E).
•BSX converts more revenue to profit (17.24% vs 2.26% net margin).
•BSX grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.29% vs 11.28% CAGR).
•CI pays a dividend (2.09% yield) while BSX does not currently pay one.

Which is better, BSX or CI?

Metric tally: BSX 6 · CI 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueCI(lower P/E)

GrowthBSX(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityBSX(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BSX	CI
P/E ratio	19.71	12.46●
Forward P/E	12.60	8.79●
P/S ratio	3.40	0.28●
P/B ratio	2.71	1.84●
PEG ratio	0.88	0.15●
EV / EBITDA	14.07	8.32●
FCF yield	4.91%	9.86%●

Profitability

Metric	BSX	CI
Gross margin	70.41%●	9.30%
Operating margin	20.12%●	3.42%
Net margin	17.24%●	2.26%
ROE	13.74%	14.90%●
ROIC	8.78%●	7.35%

Dividends

Metric	BSX	CI
Dividend yield	—	2.09%
Payout ratio	—	27.53%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BSX	CI
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	15.29%●	11.28%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-8.67%	-0.76%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	19.89%●	-2.03%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	1.86%	6.13%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, BSX or CI?: It depends on your goal. value: CI (lower P/E); growth: BSX (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: BSX (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CI leads 10 to 6.
Is BSX or CI cheaper?: On trailing earnings, CI is cheaper: BSX trades at a 19.71 P/E and CI at 12.46.
Which has grown faster, BSX or CI?: Over the past five years, BSX grew revenue faster — BSX at a 15.29% CAGR versus CI at 11.28%.
Does BSX or CI pay a bigger dividend?: CI pays a dividend (2.09% yield) while BSX does not currently pay one.
Is BSX or CI more profitable?: BSX runs the higher net margin — BSX at 17.24% versus CI at 2.26%.
Which has been the better investment, BSX or CI?: Over the past 10-year, CI delivered the higher annualized total return — BSX at 7.47% versus CI at 9.61%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BSX analysis Full CI analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Boston Scientific P/E ratio Cigna P/E ratio Boston Scientific dividend yield Cigna dividend yield Boston Scientific ROE Cigna ROE Boston Scientific operating margin Cigna operating margin Boston Scientific revenue growth Cigna revenue growth Boston Scientific free cash flow Cigna free cash flow

Boston Scientific & Cigna appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 17, 2026.