Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) vs Cigna Corporation (CI)
A side-by-side comparison of Boston Scientific Corporation and Cigna Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 31, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
BSX
Boston Scientific Corporation
$46.73HealthcareDelayed quote: Jul 31, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
CI
Cigna Corporation
$279.05HealthcareDelayed quote: Jul 31, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — BSX vs CI
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yBSX +318.9%CI +3002.4%CI compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
BSX CI
BSX vs CI: by the numbers
- •CI is the larger company ($73.82B vs $69.46B market cap).
- •CI trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.91 vs 19.00 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •BSX converts more revenue to profit (17.48% vs 2.27% net margin).
- •BSX grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.40% vs 11.11% CAGR).
- •CI pays a dividend (2.13% yield), while BSX has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BSX | CI |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 19.00 | 11.91 |
| Forward P/E | 14.11 | 9.45 |
| P/S ratio | 3.30 | 0.27 |
| P/B ratio | 2.70 | 1.78 |
| PEG ratio | 0.88 | 0.15 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.14 | 8.69 |
| FCF yield | 4.93% | 12.00% |
Profitability
| Metric | BSX | CI |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 71.16% | 6.36% |
| Operating margin | 21.60% | 3.46% |
| Net margin | 17.48% | 2.27% |
| ROE | 14.19% | 15.05% |
| ROIC | 8.78% | 7.35% |
Dividends
| Metric | BSX | CI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 2.13% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 27.53% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BSX | CI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 13.40% | 11.11% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -0.76% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 19.89% | -1.95% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 0.49% | 6.11% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, BSX or CI?
- CI has the lower trailing P/E: BSX trades at 19.00 and CI at 11.91. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, BSX or CI?
- Over the past five years, BSX grew revenue faster — BSX at a 13.40% CAGR versus CI at 11.11%.
- Does BSX or CI pay a bigger dividend?
- CI pays a dividend (2.13% yield), while BSX has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is BSX or CI more profitable?
- BSX runs the higher net margin — BSX at 17.48% versus CI at 2.27%.
- How have BSX and CI total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, BSX delivered 6.76% and CI delivered 9.22% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Boston Scientific P/E ratioCigna P/E ratioBoston Scientific dividend yieldCigna dividend yieldBoston Scientific ROECigna ROEBoston Scientific operating marginCigna operating marginBoston Scientific revenue growthCigna revenue growthBoston Scientific free cash flowCigna free cash flow
Boston Scientific & Cigna appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 31, 2026.