Is BRO or RF cheaper?

On trailing earnings, RF is cheaper: BRO trades at a 18.04 P/E and RF at 12.08.

Which has grown faster, BRO or RF?

Over the past five years, BRO grew revenue faster — BRO at a 18.73% CAGR versus RF at 7.48%.

Does BRO or RF pay a bigger dividend?

BRO yields 1.08% and RF yields 3.66% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is BRO or RF more profitable?

RF runs the higher net margin — BRO at 17.87% versus RF at 23.13%.

Which has been the better investment, BRO or RF?

Over the past 10-year, RF delivered the higher annualized total return — BRO at 13.83% versus RF at 16.46%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) vs Regions Financial Corporation (RF)

RF leads on 13 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Brown & Brown, Inc. and Regions Financial Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

BRO

Brown & Brown, Inc.

$20.24B

$59.70Financial Services

Regions Financial Corporation

$24.78B

$29.00Financial Services

Total return — BRO vs RF

growth of $100 · last 30y

BRO +5932.8%RF +51.0%BRO compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

BRO RF

BRO vs RF: by the numbers

•RF is the larger company ($24.78B vs $20.24B market cap).
•RF trades at the lower earnings multiple (12.08 vs 18.04 P/E).
•RF converts more revenue to profit (23.13% vs 17.87% net margin).
•BRO grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.73% vs 7.48% CAGR).
•RF pays the higher dividend yield (3.66% vs 1.08%).

Which is better, BRO or RF?

Metric tally: BRO 1 · RF 13

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueRF(lower P/E)

GrowthBRO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeRF(higher dividend yield)

QualityRF(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BRO	RF
P/E ratio	18.04	12.08●
Forward P/E	13.23	11.09●
P/S ratio	3.15	2.62●
P/B ratio	1.61	1.34●
PEG ratio	1.21	0.58●

Profitability

Metric	BRO	RF
Gross margin	59.38%	75.81%●
Operating margin	26.79%	29.48%●
Net margin	17.87%	23.13%●
ROE	9.12%	11.85%●
ROIC	5.87%	13.79%●

Dividends

Metric	BRO	RF
Dividend yield	1.08%	3.66%●
Payout ratio	18.97%	45.89%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BRO	RF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	18.73%●	7.48%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	14.87%	17.53%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	3.24%	12.46%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, BRO or RF?: It depends on your goal. value: RF (lower P/E); growth: BRO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: RF (higher dividend yield); quality: RF (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RF leads 13 to 1.
Is BRO or RF cheaper?: On trailing earnings, RF is cheaper: BRO trades at a 18.04 P/E and RF at 12.08.
Which has grown faster, BRO or RF?: Over the past five years, BRO grew revenue faster — BRO at a 18.73% CAGR versus RF at 7.48%.
Does BRO or RF pay a bigger dividend?: BRO yields 1.08% and RF yields 3.66% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is BRO or RF more profitable?: RF runs the higher net margin — BRO at 17.87% versus RF at 23.13%.
Which has been the better investment, BRO or RF?: Over the past 10-year, RF delivered the higher annualized total return — BRO at 13.83% versus RF at 16.46%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BRO analysis Full RF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Brown & Brown P/E ratio Regions Financial P/E ratio Brown & Brown dividend yield Regions Financial dividend yield Brown & Brown ROE Regions Financial ROE Brown & Brown operating margin Regions Financial operating margin Brown & Brown revenue growth Regions Financial revenue growth Brown & Brown free cash flow Regions Financial free cash flow

Brown & Brown & Regions Financial appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Dividend Aristocrats Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 17, 2026.