Which has grown faster, BRLT or CPHC?

Over the past five years, BRLT grew revenue faster — BRLT at a 6.82% CAGR versus CPHC at 6.30%.

Does BRLT or CPHC pay a bigger dividend?

BRLT yields 17.86% and CPHC yields 1.79% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is BRLT or CPHC more profitable?

CPHC runs the higher net margin — BRLT at -1.00% versus CPHC at 0.20%.

How have BRLT and CPHC total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, BRLT delivered -34.48% and CPHC delivered 0.98% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. (BRLT) vs Canterbury Park Holding Corporation (CPHC)

A side-by-side comparison of Brilliant Earth Group, Inc. and Canterbury Park Holding Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

BRLT

Brilliant Earth Group, Inc.

$90M

$1.40Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 5, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

CPHC

Canterbury Park Holding Corporation

$80M

$15.60Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 5, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — BRLT vs CPHC

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5y

BRLT -90.9% (-38.0%/yr)CPHC -1.5% (-0.3%/yr)CPHC compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

BRLT CPHC

BRLT vs CPHC: by the numbers

•BRLT is the larger company ($90M vs $80M market cap).
•CPHC is profitable (0.20% net margin) while BRLT runs a net loss (-1.00%).
•BRLT grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.82% vs 6.30% CAGR).
•BRLT pays the higher dividend yield (17.86% vs 1.79%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BRLT	CPHC
P/E ratio	N/A	699.55
Forward P/E	19.44	N/A
P/S ratio	0.20	1.33
P/B ratio	7.36	0.96
EV / EBITDA	N/A	9.63
FCF yield	3.22%	6.04%

Profitability

Metric	BRLT	CPHC
Gross margin	56.46%	28.67%
Operating margin	-2.02%	4.54%
Net margin	-1.00%	0.20%
ROE	-36.98%	0.14%
ROIC	-8.38%	1.46%

Dividends

Metric	BRLT	CPHC
Dividend yield	17.86%	1.79%
Payout ratio	N/A	1255.61%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BRLT	CPHC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.82%	6.30%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-40.64%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-34.48%	0.98%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, BRLT or CPHC?: Over the past five years, BRLT grew revenue faster — BRLT at a 6.82% CAGR versus CPHC at 6.30%.
Does BRLT or CPHC pay a bigger dividend?: BRLT yields 17.86% and CPHC yields 1.79% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is BRLT or CPHC more profitable?: CPHC runs the higher net margin — BRLT at -1.00% versus CPHC at 0.20%.
How have BRLT and CPHC total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, BRLT delivered -34.48% and CPHC delivered 0.98% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BRLT analysis Full CPHC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Canterbury Park P/E ratio Brilliant Earth dividend yield Canterbury Park dividend yield Brilliant Earth ROE Canterbury Park ROE Brilliant Earth operating margin Canterbury Park operating margin Brilliant Earth revenue growth Canterbury Park revenue growth Brilliant Earth free cash flow Canterbury Park free cash flow

Brilliant Earth & Canterbury Park appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.