Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK.B) vs Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST)

A side-by-side comparison of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare
Different business models: BRK.B is classified in Financial Services; COST is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

Total returnBRK.B vs COST

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30y
BRK.B +2314.3%COST +11175.1%COST compounded faster
05k10kStart $100200120062011201620212026$2,414$11,275
BRK.B COST

BRK.B vs COST: by the numbers

  • BRK.B is the larger company ($1.11T vs $428.66B market cap).
  • BRK.B trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.80 vs 47.87 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • BRK.B converts more revenue to profit (19.31% vs 3.01% net margin).
  • COST grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.48% vs 8.57% CAGR).
  • COST pays a dividend (0.56% yield), while BRK.B has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricBRK.BCOST
P/E ratio14.8047.87
Forward P/E23.8946.33
P/S ratio2.861.44
P/B ratio1.4712.62
PEG ratio1.265.23
EV / EBITDAN/A29.89
FCF yieldN/A2.08%

Profitability

MetricBRK.BCOST
Gross margin25.14%12.88%
Operating margin16.06%3.82%
Net margin19.31%3.01%
ROE9.97%26.38%
ROIC4.12%19.44%

Dividends

MetricBRK.BCOST
Dividend yieldN/A0.56%
Payout ratioN/A29.44%

Growth (annualized)

MetricBRK.BCOST
Revenue CAGR (5Y)8.57%9.48%
EPS CAGR (5Y)11.79%15.04%
FCF CAGR (5Y)N/A4.95%
Total return CAGR (5Y)12.93%18.31%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, BRK.B or COST?
BRK.B has the lower trailing P/E: BRK.B trades at 14.80 and COST at 47.87. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, BRK.B or COST?
Over the past five years, COST grew revenue faster — BRK.B at a 8.57% CAGR versus COST at 9.48%.
Does BRK.B or COST pay a bigger dividend?
COST pays a dividend (0.56% yield), while BRK.B has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is BRK.B or COST more profitable?
BRK.B runs the higher net margin — BRK.B at 19.31% versus COST at 3.01%.
How have BRK.B and COST total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, BRK.B delivered 13.47% and COST delivered 20.06% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.