Is BRK.A or NVDA cheaper?

On trailing earnings, BRK.A is cheaper: BRK.A trades at a 14.53 P/E and NVDA at 31.42.

Which has grown faster, BRK.A or NVDA?

Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — BRK.A at a 8.57% CAGR versus NVDA at 68.23%.

Does BRK.A or NVDA pay a bigger dividend?

NVDA pays a dividend (0.01% yield) while BRK.A does not currently pay one.

Is BRK.A or NVDA more profitable?

NVDA runs the higher net margin — BRK.A at 19.31% versus NVDA at 62.97%.

Which has been the better investment, BRK.A or NVDA?

Over the past 10-year, NVDA delivered the higher annualized total return — BRK.A at 13.16% versus NVDA at 68.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK.A) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)

NVDA leads on 10 of 13 compared metrics, though BRK.A is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

BRK.A

Berkshire Hathaway Inc.

$1.05T

$732100.00Financial Services

Total return — BRK.A vs NVDA

growth of $100 · last 27y

BRK.A +1051.1%NVDA +500157.2%NVDA compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

BRK.A NVDA

BRK.A vs NVDA: by the numbers

•NVDA is the larger company ($4.97T vs $1.05T market cap).
•BRK.A trades at the lower earnings multiple (14.53 vs 31.42 P/E).
•NVDA converts more revenue to profit (62.97% vs 19.31% net margin).
•NVDA grew revenue faster over the past five years (68.23% vs 8.57% CAGR).
•NVDA pays a dividend (0.01% yield) while BRK.A does not currently pay one.

Which is better, BRK.A or NVDA?

Metric tally: BRK.A 3 · NVDA 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueBRK.A(lower P/E)

GrowthNVDA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityNVDA(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BRK.A	NVDA
P/E ratio	14.53●	31.42
Forward P/E	23.55	16.44●
P/S ratio	2.80●	19.74
P/B ratio	1.45●	25.60
PEG ratio	1.23	0.57●
EV / EBITDA	—	25.96
FCF yield	—	2.38%

Profitability

Metric	BRK.A	NVDA
Gross margin	23.93%	74.15%●
Operating margin	15.28%	64.02%●
Net margin	19.31%	62.97%●
ROE	9.97%	81.65%●
ROIC	4.12%	62.88%●

Dividends

Metric	BRK.A	NVDA
Dividend yield	—	0.01%
Payout ratio	—	0.61%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BRK.A	NVDA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.57%	68.23%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	11.79%	85.78%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	—	85.52%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	11.21%	63.05%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, BRK.A or NVDA?: It depends on your goal. value: BRK.A (lower P/E); growth: NVDA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: NVDA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NVDA leads 10 to 3.
Is BRK.A or NVDA cheaper?: On trailing earnings, BRK.A is cheaper: BRK.A trades at a 14.53 P/E and NVDA at 31.42.
Which has grown faster, BRK.A or NVDA?: Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — BRK.A at a 8.57% CAGR versus NVDA at 68.23%.
Does BRK.A or NVDA pay a bigger dividend?: NVDA pays a dividend (0.01% yield) while BRK.A does not currently pay one.
Is BRK.A or NVDA more profitable?: NVDA runs the higher net margin — BRK.A at 19.31% versus NVDA at 62.97%.
Which has been the better investment, BRK.A or NVDA?: Over the past 10-year, NVDA delivered the higher annualized total return — BRK.A at 13.16% versus NVDA at 68.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.