Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK.A) vs The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS)

GS leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics, though BRK.A is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. logo
BRK.A
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
$1.05T
$733370.00Financial Services
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. logo
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
$313.52B
$1062.75Financial Services

Total return — BRK.A vs GS

growth of $100 · last 27y
BRK.A +853.7%GS +1410.0%GS compounded faster
05001k2kStart $10020042009201420192024$954$1,510
BRK.A GS

BRK.A vs GS: by the numbers

  • •BRK.A is the larger company ($1.05T vs $313.52B market cap).
  • •BRK.A trades at the lower earnings multiple (14.55 vs 19.41 P/E).
  • •BRK.A converts more revenue to profit (19.31% vs 16.31% net margin).
  • •GS grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.83% vs 8.57% CAGR).
  • •GS pays a dividend (1.60% yield) while BRK.A does not currently pay one.

Which is better, BRK.A or GS?

Metric tally: BRK.A 6 · GS 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueBRK.A(lower P/E)
GrowthGS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityBRK.A(higher ROIC)

Valuation

MetricBRK.AGS
P/E ratio14.55●19.41
Forward P/E23.5917.93●
P/S ratio2.81●2.95
P/B ratio1.45●2.67
PEG ratio1.230.61●
EV / EBITDA15.83●42.90
FCF yield2.26%—

Profitability

MetricBRK.AGS
Gross margin23.93%55.55%●
Operating margin15.28%20.48%●
Net margin19.31%●16.31%
ROE9.97%14.72%●
ROIC4.12%●1.92%

Dividends

MetricBRK.AGS
Dividend yield—1.60%
Payout ratio—32.72%

Growth (annualized)

MetricBRK.AGS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)8.57%12.83%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)11.79%15.75%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)-4.29%1.47%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)11.25%25.96%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, BRK.A or GS?
It depends on your goal. value: BRK.A (lower P/E); growth: GS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: BRK.A (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GS leads 9 to 6.
Is BRK.A or GS cheaper?
On trailing earnings, BRK.A is cheaper: BRK.A trades at a 14.55 P/E and GS at 19.41.
Which has grown faster, BRK.A or GS?
Over the past five years, GS grew revenue faster — BRK.A at a 8.57% CAGR versus GS at 12.83%.
Does BRK.A or GS pay a bigger dividend?
GS pays a dividend (1.60% yield) while BRK.A does not currently pay one.
Is BRK.A or GS more profitable?
BRK.A runs the higher net margin — BRK.A at 19.31% versus GS at 16.31%.
Which has been the better investment, BRK.A or GS?
Over the past 10-year, GS delivered the higher annualized total return — BRK.A at 13.17% versus GS at 24.15%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BRK.A analysisFull GS analysisInteractive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Berkshire Hathaway P/E ratioGoldman Sachs P/E ratioBerkshire Hathaway dividend yieldGoldman Sachs dividend yieldBerkshire Hathaway ROEGoldman Sachs ROEBerkshire Hathaway operating marginGoldman Sachs operating marginBerkshire Hathaway revenue growthGoldman Sachs revenue growthBerkshire Hathaway free cash flowGoldman Sachs free cash flow

Berkshire Hathaway & Goldman Sachs appear in these rankings

Best 10-Year Total Return StocksLowest P/E Ratio StocksLargest Companies by Market Cap

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.