Brookfield Property Partners L.P. (BPYPP) vs Phillips Edison & Co. (PECO)
A side-by-side comparison of Brookfield Property Partners L.P. and Phillips Edison & Co. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — BPYPP vs PECO
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6yBPYPP vs PECO: by the numbers
- •BPYPP is the larger company ($6.49B vs $4.81B market cap).
- •PECO is profitable (19.13% net margin) while BPYPP runs a net loss (-3.56%).
- •PECO grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.01% vs 2.40% CAGR).
- •BPYPP pays the higher dividend yield (10.62% vs 3.48%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BPYPP | PECO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | N/A | 32.57 |
| Forward P/E | 16.13 | 43.54 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 0.41 |
| P/S ratio | 0.91 | 6.41 |
| P/B ratio | 0.75 | 2.03 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.51 | 15.38 |
| FCF yield | N/A | 4.94% |
For REITs like Phillips Edison & Co., GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.
Profitability
| Metric | BPYPP | PECO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 52.31% | -1.39% |
| Operating margin | 35.48% | 29.03% |
| Net margin | -3.56% | 19.13% |
| ROE | -2.72% | 6.05% |
| ROIC | 1.37% | 4.14% |
Dividends
| Metric | BPYPP | PECO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 10.62% | 3.48% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 113.59% |
Phillips Edison & Co.'s payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BPYPP | PECO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 2.40% | 8.01% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 78.78% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 5.16% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -0.08% | 7.30% |
Frequently asked
- Which has grown faster, BPYPP or PECO?
- Over the past five years, PECO grew revenue faster — BPYPP at a 2.40% CAGR versus PECO at 8.01%.
- Does BPYPP or PECO pay a bigger dividend?
- BPYPP yields 10.62% and PECO yields 3.48% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BPYPP or PECO more profitable?
- PECO runs the higher net margin — BPYPP at -3.56% versus PECO at 19.13%.
- How have BPYPP and PECO total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, BPYPP delivered -0.08% and PECO delivered 7.30% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Brookfield Property Partners L.P. & Phillips Edison appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.